https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57699
--- Comment #17 from PJ Fanning <fannin...@yahoo.com> --- Hi Sebastian - supporting Strict OOXML format is a big undertaking and my impression is that this format has not really taken off (there aren't too many people asking about it). If you read my comment from 2021-02-13, you'll see that there is some support already but it is limited. I would encourage you to spell out your plan because we may not necessarily want to support the strict format in poi-ooxml lib and might want to add a new jar dedicated to strict format - because we could end up bloating poi-ooxml by trying to support both formats in one jar. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@poi.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@poi.apache.org
