[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/XMLBEANS-567?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17379804#comment-17379804
]
Dmitry Lastochkin commented on XMLBEANS-567:
--------------------------------------------
Hi, [~pj.fanning]!
bq. Could you try v4.0.0 or v3.1.0 to see if they work? It would be useful if
we could track down the version where these features stopped working.
Unfortunately, this will be problematic. But I can say for sure that the
described problems are the result of replacing JAM with JavaParser. This
happened in XMLBEANS-539 (see
[comment|https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/XMLBEANS-539?focusedCommentId=17111500&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#comment-17111500]).
> Problems with XMLBeans Extension Interfaces Feature
> ---------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: XMLBEANS-567
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/XMLBEANS-567
> Project: XMLBeans
> Issue Type: Task
> Affects Versions: Version 5.0.0
> Reporter: Dmitry Lastochkin
> Priority: Major
>
> Hello! In our project we are using [XMLBeans Extension Interfaces
> Feature|https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/XMLBEANS/ExtensionInterfacesFeature].
> When we compile the TypeSystem (using {{SchemaTypeSystemCompiler.compile}}),
> we add the jar with our extension classes to classpath parameter. In XMLBeans
> 2.4 it works perfectly. But when we updated to XMLBeans 5.0.0, we encountered
> the following error during an extensions validation:
> {code}
> Interface 'SomeInterface' not found."
> {code}
> As far as I understand, this is because
> {{org.apache.xmlbeans.impl.config.Parser}} does not search classes in
> classpath (only in files).
> When we added the sources of the extension interface to the parameters,
> TypeSystem compiled successfuly. But then we ran into another problem. When
> XMLBeans generates java files from XSD, it uses simple class names (instead
> of fully qualified names as it was in XMLBeans 2.4.0) for the classes that
> are used in methods of the extension interface (like parameters types or
> return types). And therefore the geneted files cannot be compiled if the
> extension classes are in a different package.
> Are those changes (ingorning classpath when searching for extenstions and
> using simple names for extenstion classes in code generation instead of fully
> qualified names) were made intentionally? Such limitations are hard to work
> around, making an upgrade from older XMLBeans version very complicated.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
