Hi,

I will definitely need to reorganise my life to reserve some time for the 
required XDDF improvements. The code has been developed with only a few 
examples. This is why it is still marked with @Beta but people seem to start 
using it for real...

Best regards,
Alain FAGOT BÉAREZ


⁣Obter o BlueMail para Android ​

Em 18 de out de 2021 23:14, em 23:14, PJ Fanning <fannin...@yahoo.com.invalid> 
escreveu:
>A large fraction of the errors
>in 
>http://people.apache.org/~centic/poi_regression/reports/index500RC2to510RC1.html
>relate to cloning sheets that contain charts - where the XDDF code
>fails to clone the chart.
>
>This is just an observation - I must admit to not knowing much about
>the XDDF code.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>On Monday 18 October 2021, 18:04:54 IST, Dominik Stadler
><dominik.stad...@gmx.at> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>Hi,
>
>See the report at
>http://people.apache.org/~centic/poi_regression/reports/index500RC2to510RC1.html
>, one of the files is
>http://people.apache.org/~centic/poi_regression/reports/bib-chernigovka.netdo.ru_download_docs_17459.doc
>(it's actually a docx, so is processed via XSSFFileHandler).
>
>Thanks... Dominik.
>
>On Mon, Oct 18, 2021 at 5:06 PM PJ Fanning
><fannin...@yahoo.com.invalid>
>wrote:
>
>> Hi Dominik,
>> Would you be able to provide one of the files that causes the missing
>xsb
>> issues? I could try debugging to see if I can see why it fails.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Monday 18 October 2021, 12:12:02 IST, PJ Fanning
>> <fannin...@yahoo.com.invalid> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Maybe POI 5.1.0 poi-ooxml can default to poi-ooxml-full as the
>dependency
>> and we could produce the lite jar with a health warning and
>documentation
>> about how to use that instead if you choose to? After POI 5.1.0, we
>could
>> see if the community needs the lite jar at all. Some users still try
>to use
>> POI on android and maybe they would prefer smaller jar sizes.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Monday 18 October 2021, 11:54:04 IST, Dominik Stadler <
>> dominik.stad...@gmx.at> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> hm, would be fairly tedious to look for up to 107 documents and add
>all of
>> them to the integration-tests. Would be nice to know what changes
>made them
>> required now as the documents themselves did not change. For now I
>will
>> trigger another mass-testing run with "full" sometimes this week.
>>
>> FYI, as "lite" is only 3-times smaller than "full" nowadays and
>disk-sizes
>> and download speeds have greatly improved over the years I will
>propose
>> removal of the "lite" jar and all the related pieces after the 5.1.0
>> release. The amount of work we put into this is very high and gains
>for our
>> uses are small by now. Even the recent JDK 17 segfaults in CI may be
>> related to byte-code rewriting that is done for this. Also building
>locally
>> takes ages because nearly every Gradle target has to run all tests
>> including integration-tests now, very hard to do anything useful, at
>least
>> for me.
>>
>> Dominik.
>>
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Oct 18, 2021 at 11:40 AM PJ Fanning
><fannin...@yahoo.com.invalid>
>> wrote:
>>
>> > Thanks Dominik for running the tests. I'm not sure what the best
>approach
>> > is but adding some of the files that cause the missing xsb issues
>to the
>> > poi-test-data dir might be a good starting point.
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > On Monday 18 October 2021, 08:05:21 IST, Dominik Stadler <
>> > dominik.stad...@gmx.at> wrote:
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > FYI, I did re-run the mass-testing and the missing schema is still
>> > reported a lot (>90k times).
>> >
>> > One sample missing xsb is
>> > org/apache/poi/schemas/ooxml/system/ooxml/backgroundelement.xsb
>> >
>> > This was also not included in the "lite" package in 5.0.0, so it
>seems
>> > some code-change now requires this, but it is not included
>> automatically...
>> >
>> > I extracted the attached list of 107 missing XSBs.
>> >
>> > Dominik.
>> >
>> >
>> > On Fri, Oct 15, 2021 at 1:17 AM Andreas Beeker
><kiwiwi...@apache.org>
>> > wrote:
>> > > "Kept you waiting, huh?" (tm) -No problem for me ... XmlBeans RC2
>looks
>> > good so far, therefore it can be only a matter of days.
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > On 15.10.21 00:06, PJ Fanning wrote:
>> > >> With POI trunk, I've added a use case that relies on XMLBeans
>5.0.2
>> > release. Can we wait until XMLBeans 5.0.2 is released?
>Alternatively, I
>> can
>> > remove the new POI code that use XmlOptions
>> setDisallowDocTypeDeclaration.
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@poi.apache.org
>> > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@poi.apache.org
>
>>
>>
>> > >
>> > >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@poi.apache.org
>> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@poi.apache.org
>> >
>> >
>---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@poi.apache.org
>> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@poi.apache.org
>> >
>> >
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@poi.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@poi.apache.org
>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@poi.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@poi.apache.org
>>
>>
>
>---------------------------------------------------------------------
>To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@poi.apache.org
>For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@poi.apache.org

Reply via email to