https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59663
Dominik Stadler <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution|--- |WONTFIX Status|NEW |RESOLVED --- Comment #1 from Dominik Stadler <[email protected]> --- I don't think there are any plans to do this. The sample exception that you list shows the types of problems that we would run into. Any lazily-initialized data-structure would be a potential case of errors. Sometimes the error message will be much harder to interpret or there even might be very strange incorrect behavior without any indication that multi-threading access is the culprit. Therefore I am closing this as WONTFIX for now. Even if someone would come up with some initial patches, I would vote against changing the official stance on multi-threading as such a guarantee would come with an additional maintenance burden that very likely no-one is willing to provide. Lastly, any such change likely has some performance impact on current single-threaded usages of the code, thus creating other problems for cases where large documents are processed already now. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
