https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67784
--- Comment #4 from PJ Fanning <fannin...@yahoo.com> --- that day, all the other changes were for https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66365 - so it probably relates to that In the end of the day, POI has a lot of bugs and low test coverage. Can we start by working out of the 'regression' causes working code to now have a bug or if we have changed the issue because the old behaviour was a bug? I much prefer not reverting code without having a test scenario that can be used to decide if the regression is needed and the test case can protect against future regressions. I just added r1913064 and that seems to be the correct behaviour (to me). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@poi.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@poi.apache.org
