Hi folks, As said yesterday during the community meeting, I'm moving on the 0.9.0-incubating release today.
First, I realized that the version was not correct: as ASF incubator podling, Polaris has to use -incubating in the version. I created this PR: https://github.com/apache/polaris/pull/451 I will merge as soon as I have a review ;) I'm documenting all steps I'm using for the release (preparation steps, git commands, etc). The purpose is to document the release process on the website and I will also create a script to automatically does this. I will keep you posted soon. Regards JB On Tue, Nov 12, 2024 at 2:34 PM Jean-Baptiste Onofré <j...@nanthrax.net> wrote: > > Hi folks, > > I created KEYS file > (https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/incubator/polaris/KEYS) to > start the 0.9.0 release preparation. > I will also create a PR to "document" the current release process. > > I will keep you posted about the 0.9.0 release progress (stay tuned > for the vote email :)). > > Thanks ! > Regards > > JB > > > On Fri, Oct 18, 2024 at 11:17 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré <j...@nanthrax.net> > wrote: > > > > Hi folks, > > > > First of all, thanks everyone for the first community meeting > > yesterday. It was a great meeting, very interesting discussions. > > You can find the meeting notes on the Polaris website > > (https://polaris.apache.org/community/meetings/): > > > > https://docs.google.com/document/d/1TAAMjCtk4KuWSwfxpCBhhK9vM1k_3n7YE4L28slclXU/edit?usp=sharing > > > > As discussed during the meeting, here's the release proposal: > > - the first Polaris release will be 0.9. I'm doing a new pass on the > > preparation steps (due diligence on > > NOTICE/LICENSE/DISCLAIMER/dependencies, automatic "scripts", etc). As > > we are mid October, I propose to actually release 0.9 at the beginning > > of November. > > This release is to verify our distribution with both the Polaris > > community and also the Apache Incubator (IPMC). > > - After 0.9 release, I propose to move forward to 1.0 release (I think > > it would be great to have 1.0 release before end of the year) > > - I also think we should use the "fast" major version as soon as we > > introduce any breaking change. I don't see a problem with having > > Polaris 1, Polaris 2, Polaris 3, ... quickly if needed. > > > > Regards > > JB
