+1 On Fri, Feb 21, 2025 at 11:31 AM Eric Maynard <eric.w.mayn...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Obligatory +1 as it's my issue -- I'm also open to less frequent. > > My pitch: This is an upper bound on how often we update dependencies, not a > lower bound. If an actual person sees an actual reason to update a > dependency, they can and should still do that :) > > --EM > > On Fri, Feb 21, 2025 at 9:27 AM Alex Dutra <alex.du...@dremio.com.invalid> > wrote: > > > +0 as well, I am not bothered by Renovate at all personally. > > > > On Fri, Feb 21, 2025 at 6:16 PM Dmitri Bourlatchkov <di...@apache.org> > > wrote: > > > > > +0 -- Renovate "noise" does not bother me personally, but I'm ok with > > less > > > frequent updates. > > > > > > Cheers, > > > Dmitri. > > > > > > On Fri, Feb 21, 2025 at 8:41 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré <j...@nanthrax.net> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > Hi folks, > > > > > > > > I know it's a hot topic, but I would like to avoid any frustration in > > > > our community. > > > > > > > > Before the vote, let me put some context. > > > > > > > > To manage our dependency updates, we are using renovatebot. > > > > The current renovatebot configuration uses "at any time" schedule > > > > (e.g. * * * * * cron), except for AWS SDK and boto3 updates which run > > > > weekly. > > > > Some contributors are complaining about the "noise" generated by > > > > renovatebot. > > > > In order to "mitigate" that, we introduced "polaris-renovate" label > to > > > > easily filter the notification coming from renovatebot. > > > > However, an issue has been created 4 days ago > > > > (https://github.com/apache/polaris/issues/1018), meaning the "issue" > > > > is still there. > > > > > > > > So, I propose this vote to have clear feedback from the community, as > > > > we don't have clear lazy consensus. > > > > > > > > The vote is to schedule renovatebot update weekly: > > > > > > > > [ ] +1 - Use weekly schedule for all renovatebot updates > > > > [ ] 0 > > > > [ ] -1 - Don't use weekly schedule, keep the "at any time" schedule > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > Regards > > > > JB > > > > > > > > NB: we can consider this vote as a code modification vote (see > > > > > > https://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html#votes-on-code-modification > > > ). > > > > > > > > > >
