"polaris-tools" SGTM. Cheers, Dmitri.
On Wed, Feb 26, 2025 at 5:15 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré <j...@nanthrax.net> wrote: > Yes, we have to keep polaris in the repo name to clearly state it > belongs to Polaris (remember we are directly in the apache org > https://github.com/apache). > > polaris-tools is fine for me. I honestly think it won't stay there > super long, and these "tools" will probably be used in federated > catalogs or foreign tables (just guessing :)). > > Let me rename the repo (or recreate it). > > Thanks everyone, > Regards > JB > > On Wed, Feb 26, 2025 at 7:24 AM Yufei Gu <flyrain...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > "polaris-tools" sounds good to me. I assume it's not only used by > > developers. > > > > Yufei > > > > > > On Tue, Feb 25, 2025 at 10:56 PM Ajantha Bhat <ajanthab...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > > > JB mentioned that it has to have `polaris` in the repo name. > > > > > > How about calling it as `apache/*polaris-dev-tools*`? It can have an > > > iceberg catalog migrator CLI, Delta lake catalog migrator CLI, or > something > > > else in the future as part of this repo. > > > > > > I don't want the repo to be called just > `apache/polaris-catalog-migrator` > > > because it sounds like it is just a migrator from/to polaris catalog. > > > > > > - Ajantha > > > >
