Thanks Andrew for the effort. I'm very much in favor of having the
ability to receive events.
From the doc and from the implementation it's hard to reason about the
actual use cases / problems that the approach is going to tackle.
Can you please enhance the document and describe the use cases and what
information those need?
Technically speaking (from the PR) it's nice to know that e.g. a table
has been changed, but I think that the information is incomplete,
because important attributes like realm, catalog, table identifier and
actor are missing.
I'm also curious how the approach is intended to be extensible and
backwards compatible when adding new features (generic tables, policies,
etc).
Since we're talking about event payload here, I think it's necessary to
give users a direction / proposal about which attributes must/may be
serialized in which way to be "future proof".
Robert
On 27.02.25 00:09, Andrew Guterman wrote:
Just opened a PR https://github.com/apache/polaris/pull/922
Best,
Andrew
On Thu, Jan 30, 2025 at 12:24 PM Andrew Guterman <andrew.guterm...@gmail.com>
wrote:
Hi all,
Apologies for the delay.
Here's my doc
<https://docs.google.com/document/d/1sJiFKeMlPVlqRUj8Rv4YufMMrfCq_3ZFtDuNv_8eOQ0/edit?usp=sharing>
for this along with 2 prototypes: one using Jakarta Events and the other
using a custom interface:
Please leave comments directly on the doc or reply to this thread.
Best,
Andrew
On Fri, Jan 24, 2025 at 9:59 AM Andrew Guterman <
andrew.guterm...@gmail.com> wrote:
I've got a draft in progress and am hoping to share it next week to
collect feedback.
Best,
Andrew
On Tue, Jan 21, 2025 at 6:01 PM Yufei Gu <flyrain...@gmail.com> wrote:
Quakus runtime(PR469) has been merged. Do we plan to proceed with
this proposal? Is there any design doc we can refer to?
Yufei
On Tue, Jan 7, 2025 at 3:10 PM Andrew Guterman <
andrew.guterm...@gmail.com>
wrote:
Happy new year everyone.
I'm still interested in this but waiting for the migration to Quarkus
to be
fully done before proposing anything concrete, as I'd like to see how
much
of this will already be possible.
Best,
Andrew
On Tue, Dec 17, 2024 at 12:23 AM Robert Stupp <sn...@snazy.de> wrote:
On 14.12.24 11:11, Alex Dutra wrote:
ServiceLoader
works, but all the implementations you intend to use must be
present at
build time.
Correct (my previous email was wrong wrt to class loading).
--
Robert Stupp
@snazy
--
Robert Stupp
@snazy
