+1

Best,
Yun

On Tue, Mar 25, 2025 at 9:22 AM Honah J. <hon...@apache.org> wrote:

> +1 (non-binding)
>
> Best,
> Honah (Jonas)
>
> On Tue, Mar 25, 2025 at 8:22 AM Yufei Gu <flyrain...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > +1
> >
> > Yufei
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Mar 25, 2025 at 8:03 AM Prashant Singh
> > <prashant.si...@snowflake.com.invalid> wrote:
> >
> > > +1 (non-binding)
> > >
> > > Best,
> > > Prashant
> > >
> > > On Tue, Mar 25, 2025 at 7:01 AM Dmitri Bourlatchkov <di...@apache.org>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > +1 LGTM.
> > > >
> > > > Cheers,
> > > > Dmitri.
> > > >
> > > > On Tue, Mar 25, 2025 at 12:30 AM Dennis Huo <huoi...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Hello all,
> > > > >
> > > > > We've had some productive discussion in various places on the
> mailing
> > > > list,
> > > > > in the github PR, and in the live community sync now about the
> > initial
> > > > > minimal updates to the Polaris REST API (under the "management
> API")
> > > for
> > > > > adding a ConnectionConfigInfo field to ExternalCatalogs to
> represent
> > > > > external federation:
> > > > >
> > > > > https://lists.apache.org/thread/szq8nzhblgwz0w71g5wh8kkcwbm7nhkn
> > > > > https://github.com/apache/polaris/pull/1026
> > > > >
> > > > > To recap, the the ConnectionConfigInfo is designed to be extensible
> > so
> > > > that
> > > > > we can eventually define a variety of federation sources, but
> > currently
> > > > > just defines a minimal Iceberg REST federation so that we have a
> good
> > > > > starting point to start implementing the internals of federation
> > > without
> > > > > biting off too much.
> > > > >
> > > > > We've also agreed the current proposed API is marked as
> > "experimental"
> > > > and
> > > > > "subject to change", so this step also doesn't entrench the API
> > > > definition
> > > > > in stone yet.
> > > > >
> > > > > This thread commences our formal vote for addition of this initial
> > API
> > > > and
> > > > > merging the PR listed above.
> > > > >
> > > > > [ ] +1 Merge  https://github.com/apache/polaris/pull/1026
> > > > > [ ] +0
> > > > > [ ] -1 Do not merge because...
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

Reply via email to