Hi

If the dependency is used for test (and not bundled in one of our
distributed artifacts) and we don’t copy code from this dependency, we can
use GPL/LGPL dependency. What matters is the code we copy from another
project and the dependencies we bundle in our artifacts.

Regards
JB

Le mer. 26 mars 2025 à 14:08, Pierre Laporte <pie...@pingtimeout.fr> a
écrit :

> Hello all
>
> In https://github.com/apache/polaris/issues/761, there is a discussion on
> whether the EntityCache is thread-safe, prone to race conditions,
> inconsistencies, etc...
>
> To determine whether these issues are real, I worked on JCStress [1]
> tests.  JCStress is a testing framework developed by Oracle that helps
> verify correct behavior of concurrent Java code.  I would like to discuss
> the possibility to add such tests to the Polaris project.
>
> Here is an example of tests:
>
> https://github.com/pingtimeout/polaris/blob/jcstress/jcstress-tests/src/jcstress/java/org/apache/polaris/core/persistence/cache/EntityCacheCoherenceTest.java#L34-L99
> .
> And here is an example of the insights we can get out of them:
>
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1ZF5WGiSOoqg9JpSvFfhuPOK0QrqeY431/edit?tab=t.0#bookmark=id.op4496ui0vzi
> .
>
> These tests are similar to unit tests, in that there should be no
> dependency on external components, they should be fast so that millions of
> invocations can be performed in a reasonable timeframe, and they should be
> fine-grained.  To that extent, it would make sense to colocate them with
> the codebase, in the main repository.
>
> But JCStress is released under the GPL-v2, which seems incompatible with
> the ASLv2 [2].  Does anybody have any experience with such integrations?
> We would make use of the JCStress framework, as opposed to extending it.
> But couldn't this be considered derivative work?  In which case, should the
> concurrency tests be developed as a separate project (and/or in a separate
> repository) so that they themselves are released under the GPL-v2 ?
>
> Thoughts?
>
> [1] https://github.com/openjdk/jcstress
> [2] https://www.apache.org/licenses/GPL-compatibility.html
>
> --
>
> Pierre
>

Reply via email to