+1. Thanks Jonas for the change!
Yufei

On Sat, Apr 5, 2025 at 6:45 PM Honah J. <hon...@apache.org> wrote:

> Hi folks,
>
> Thanks for the feedback and discussion so far. Based on our PR discussion
> about naming, we’ve simplified “namespace-path” to “namespace” for clarity.
>
> Please continue to vote.
>
> Thanks,
> Honah (Jonas)
>
> On Fri, Apr 4, 2025 at 8:22 PM Dmitri Bourlatchkov <di...@apache.org>
> wrote:
>
> > Thanks for the update Honah!
> >
> > Upgrading my vote to +1
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Dmitri.
> >
> > On Fri, Apr 4, 2025 at 7:54 PM Honah J. <hon...@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> > > Thank you for your comment. Based on our discussion, I renamed the new
> > > "namespaces" field to "namespace-path". This change better reflects
> that
> > > the field identifies a single namespace and differentiates it from the
> > > namespace parameter, which is a single string.
> > >
> > > Please continue to vote.
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Honah(Jonas)
> > >
> > > On Fri, Apr 4, 2025 at 4:42 PM Dmitri Bourlatchkov <di...@apache.org>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > +0 the PR looks ok to me, but I made a non-critical comment in GH.
> > > >
> > > > Thanks,
> > > > Dmitri.
> > > >
> > > > On Fri, Apr 4, 2025 at 5:23 PM Honah J. <hon...@apache.org> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Hi folks,
> > > > >
> > > > > I'd like to raise a vote for adding `inhertied` and `namespaces`
> > fields
> > > > to
> > > > > GetApplicablePolicies' response. These fields give users more
> > > information
> > > > > about whether the effective policy is inherited from its parent and
> > the
> > > > > namespaces where the effective policy is located. You can find more
> > > > details
> > > > > in the discussion thread:
> > > > >
> > > > > https://lists.apache.org/thread/z2lh1cqjcznc1qvtwy46bq18p6psz5bn
> > > > >
> > > > > This vote will be open for at least 72 hours.
> > > > >
> > > > > [ ] +1 Merge https://github.com/apache/polaris/pull/1277
> > > > > [ ] +0
> > > > > [ ] -1 Do not merge because...
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

Reply via email to