Hi Yes, BSD is totally fine (see https://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html).
Just the LICENSE file will be updated. Regards JB On Sat, Apr 19, 2025 at 10:35 PM Yufei Gu <flyrain...@gmail.com> wrote: > > +1 on removing the conditional build, and including it in the docker image. > > My only concern is the jdbc driver license. It'd be fine if we used > postgres one. BSD 2-clause is permissive[1][2]. > > [1] https://mvnrepository.com/artifact/org.postgresql/postgresql/42.7.4 > [2] https://jdbc.postgresql.org/license/. > > Yufei > > > On Fri, Apr 18, 2025 at 11:17 PM Jean-Baptiste Onofré <j...@nanthrax.net> > wrote: > > > Yes, that's the plan (cleanup the conditional build steps). > > > > If no objections, I will go ahead on a PR. > > > > Let's see what the others are thinking. > > > > Regards > > JB > > > > On Fri, Apr 18, 2025 at 11:08 PM Dmitri Bourlatchkov <di...@apache.org> > > wrote: > > > > > > I agree that including the EclipseLink-based Persistence into binary > > > distributions is a good idea. > > > > > > I'd even take this one step further and remove all conditional build > > steps > > > for EclipseLink and include it in regular builds too. > > > > > > Cheers, > > > Dmitri. > > > > > > On Fri, Apr 18, 2025 at 2:12 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré <j...@nanthrax.net> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > Hi folks > > > > > > > > As discussed yesterday during the community meeting, I propose we > > include > > > > eclipselink module by default in Polaris server distribution and docker > > > > image. > > > > > > > > I think it would help our users to easily start with Polaris. > > > > I would like to include this for 0.10.0-beta-incubating release. > > > > > > > > Thoughts ? > > > > > > > > Regards > > > > JB > > > > > >
