On Thu, May 29, 2025 at 7:40 PM Yufei Gu <flyrain...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I'm supportive if it adds value to both Polaris devs and users. Ok thanks, I am glad we have agreement on the initiative, even if we still have to discuss the implementation details. But, I don't think the Polaris project is in a position to provide a > generic building infrastructure for integration tests. > Could you clarify why you think that? It is a bit hard to provide answers to such feedback. Can we list use cases the plugin tries to cover? I'd be happy to have a > discussion session if needed. > I believe I have listed the main high-level features in my first e-mail. Are you referring to something else? Pierre
