Hi Yufei,

Certainly, here's the dedicated discussion thread for PR 1890:
https://lists.apache.org/thread/c0sk6hmtz9l4vs0mjc21wvlpblqhgx7r

Cheers,
Dmitri.

On Fri, Jun 13, 2025 at 12:52 PM Yufei Gu <flyrain...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Dimiri,
>
> Thanks a lot for driving this initiative[1].  Can you raise a separate dev
> mail thread for this? I think this deserves a broad awareness.
>
> 1. https://github.com/apache/polaris/pull/1890
>
> Yufei
>
>
> On Fri, Jun 13, 2025 at 4:53 AM Robert Stupp <sn...@snazy.de> wrote:
>
> > I was thinking of how the Docker images are being staged and eventually
> > released. I know there was a dev-ML thread about this, but I think this
> > topic is important for the 1.0 release, so raising it here.
> >
> > The release-guide doesn't mention images at all, so the process isn't
> > clear.
> >
> > TL;DR of my reasoning is that we likely need 3 (!) repositories for both
> > the server and admin-tool:
> > * one for nightlies
> > * one for staging (before release-vote passes)
> > * one for released versions
> >
> > Due to the nature and restrictions of image repositories (no notion of
> > "snapshots") we cannot push "pending releases" to the 3rd one, because
> > tools like renovate of dependabot would blindly use those (same problem
> > as nightlies vs releases).
> >
> > Thoughts?
> >
> > On 16.05.25 04:31, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
> > > Hi Yufei
> > >
> > > Thanks for your message !
> > >
> > > It looks good to me.
> > >
> > > As prerequisite (obviously), we should also complete
> > > 0.10.0-beta-incubating release to be sure we are good there before
> > > 1.0.0.
> > >
> > > Just a comment: I think we should limit the number of community
> > > meetings. This topic should be typically discussed on the mailing list
> > > (as you are doing :)).
> > > The reasons why I'm not big fan of too much meeetings are:
> > > 1. No everyone in the community can join (due to timezone, not willing
> > > to speak/appear on call, ...)
> > > 2. It puts "pressure" on the community to attend ("if I'm not in the
> > > meeting, I'm not in the community" issue)
> > > 3. Due to 1 & 2, no decision should be taken in meetings, and even if
> > > meetings are recorded, it's not archive as mailing list
> > > So, I encourage meetings as community meet&greed, or to discuss about
> > > specific topics, not decision making topic.
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Regards
> > > JB
> > >
> > >
> > > On Thu, May 15, 2025 at 11:38 PM Yufei Gu <flyrain...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > >> Hi folks,
> > >>
> > >> Many users have been asking about the Polaris release, and I believe
> > it's
> > >> critical to have a formal, production-ready 1.0 release ASAP. Thanks
> to
> > the
> > >> community’s hard work, we’re very close with a few remaining blockers
> we
> > >> need to resolve.
> > >>
> > >> To keep things moving, I scheduled a community meeting for the 1.0
> > release
> > >> next Monday at 9 AM PST.  At the same time, sharing all issues marked
> > with
> > >> 1.0 blocker. We could resolve them here if possible. Feel free to
> chime
> > in,
> > >> remove the blocker tag if you think it's not a blocker, or pick any
> up.
> > >> Thanks a lot in advance!
> > >>
> > >> Here is the list:
> > >>
> > >>     - Add CI for Python code (
> > >>        <https://github.com/apache/polaris/issues/1058>#1058),
> > >>        - Polaris persistence concurrency issues (#777)
> > >>        <https://github.com/apache/polaris/issues/777>
> > >>        - Task handling is incomplete (#774)
> > >>        <https://github.com/apache/polaris/issues/774>
> > >>        - Generated files in regtests/client/python/polaris (#755)
> > >>        <https://github.com/apache/polaris/issues/755>
> > >>        - Resources not properly closed, resource & memory leaks (#563)
> > >>        <https://github.com/apache/polaris/issues/563>
> > >>        - Make Polaris safe against certain unparseable locations
> (#552)
> > >>        <https://github.com/apache/polaris/issues/552>
> > >>        - [BUG] Assumption that cache eviction does not happen (#544)
> > >>        <https://github.com/apache/polaris/issues/544>
> > >>
> > >> To make it more interactive, you can also comment on the google
> > >> spreadsheet here:
> > >>
> >
> https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1GyLvp2cdYwioOsBwszNWiphZt_IIdo4LIfsZBFV88mc/edit?usp=sharing
> > >>
> > >> Yufei
> >
> > --
> > Robert Stupp
> > @snazy
> >
> >
>

Reply via email to