Hi I agree to remove the file.
It doesn’t have any impact on committee privileges (that’s manage on whimsy). Regards JB Le ven. 13 juin 2025 à 19:17, Yufei Gu <flyrain...@gmail.com> a écrit : > Agreed to remove automatic tagging. Just one minor concern, does removing > CODEOWNERS impact committers' write privilege? I hope not. > > Yufei > > > On Fri, Jun 13, 2025 at 9:48 AM Eric Maynard <eric.w.mayn...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > I agree that the automatic tagging is getting out of hand, thanks for > > raising this. I think just deleting CODEOWNERS is a pretty good idea. > > > > Once that's done however, I worry that a potential contributor might not > > know who to tag on a PR and might either just pick someone randomly or be > > stuck waiting for someone to happen to see the PR. It would be good if we > > could somehow create different teams you can add for review, or maybe tag > > different people on the PR based on the label added to it. Or, maybe we > > could keep CODEOWNERS as an opt-in thing. > > > > --EM > > > > On Fri, Jun 13, 2025 at 9:27 AM Robert Stupp <sn...@snazy.de> wrote: > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > as of today, every committer to Polaris is mentioned in the CODEOWNERS > > > file. This forces every committer to receive an email for every PR > > > creation, every comment, every merge and so on - quite a lot of emails > > > every day. IMHO it's already quite difficult to prioritize those or > even > > > figure out mentions. > > > > > > Therefore, I propose to delete the CODEOWNERS file entirely. This > leaves > > > everybody still the option to subscribe to all these messages via > GitHub > > > settings or the issues@ / commits@ mailing lists. But that's an opt-in > > > for those who want it - contrary for those who do not want all emails > > > without, but not have an out-out. > > > > > > Thoughts? > > > > > > Robert > > > > > > > > >
