Thanks everyone who participated in the vote for Release Apache Polaris
1.0.0 (rc6).

The vote result is:

+1: 4 (binding), 6 (non-binding)
+0: 0 (binding), 0 (non-binding)
-1: 0 (binding), 0 (non-binding)

A new vote is starting in the Apache Incubator general mailing list.

Yufei


On Sun, Jul 6, 2025 at 11:38 AM Yufei Gu <flyrain...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi Dongjoon, JB, added the following additional files. Thanks Dongjoon for
> sharing the point that the ASF INFRA team may or may not admit *.prov files
> for signatures and checksums. This is an extra step to make sure the
> release can pass. We don't have to do that once we verify with the INFRA
> team if *.prov is valid.
>
>    - polaris-1.0.0-incubating.tgz.asc
>    
> <https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/polaris/helm-chart/1.0.0-incubating/polaris-1.0.0-incubating.tgz.asc>
>    - polaris-1.0.0-incubating.tgz.sha512
>    
> <https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/polaris/helm-chart/1.0.0-incubating/polaris-1.0.0-incubating.tgz.sha512>
>
> Thanks Robert and Dmitri for raising the concern of the jar name. We can
> definitely improve on it. but it shouldn't be a blocker for the 1.0.0
> release IMHO. I'm pretty sure there is a lot to improve, but at this
> moment, the most important thing is to deliver a stable release that is
> highly demanded. Then we can get feedback and prioritize the improvement
> items.
>
> Yufei
>
>
> On Sat, Jul 5, 2025 at 11:43 AM yun zou <yunzou.colost...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Agree with Russel.
>>
>> PR 1991 is intended to affect only the bundle JAR usage when using the
>> --jars option.
>> The --packages use case will continue to work as it does today. Since the
>> JAR name
>> already changes with each version update, I don’t believe the JAR name
>> change alone
>> should block the 1.0 release.
>>
>> Best Regards,
>> Yun
>>
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Jul 4, 2025 at 7:49 PM Russell Spitzer <russell.spit...@gmail.com
>> >
>> wrote:
>>
>> > Since all the artifacts are going to change their names when Polaris
>> > graduates (hopefully) I don’t think we should over index on having
>> > everything settled at this moment
>> >
>> >  Given that this is part of an experimental feature it doesn’t seem to
>> me
>> > like it’s worth delaying the release for alignment on the jar name for
>> the
>> > bundle artifact when the most common usage will say the same. Especially
>> > since if we graduate between now and the next release we would be
>> changing
>> > it anyway.
>> >
>> > On Fri, Jul 4, 2025 at 11:37 AM Dmitri Bourlatchkov <di...@apache.org>
>> > wrote:
>> >
>> > > Hi Yufei (as a release manager for 1.0.0):
>> > >
>> > > Even though RC6 has approving votes so far, let's resolve this concern
>> > > (quoted below) before closing the vote.
>> > >
>> > > Thanks,
>> > > Dmitri.
>> > >
>> > > On Fri, Jul 4, 2025 at 9:48 AM Dmitri Bourlatchkov <di...@apache.org>
>> > > wrote:
>> > >
>> > > > Good point, Robert! I missed the artifact name change while
>> reviewing
>> > > > PR 1991.
>> > > >
>> > > > With RC6 this Spark option worked for me (no classifier):
>> > > >
>> > > >  --packages
>> org.apache.polaris:polaris-spark-3.5_2.12:1.0.0-incubating
>> > > >
>> > > > In RC6 the bundle jar
>> > > (polaris-spark-3.5_2.12-1.0.0-incubating-bundle.jar)
>> > > > is under the same maven artifact name (with classifier). I believe
>> it
>> > is
>> > > > this jar that is going to be renamed in PR 1991.
>> > > >
>> > > > I do not think the bundle jar was meant for download via Maven.
>> IIRC,
>> > it
>> > > > was meant for manual use with the --jars Spark option.
>> > > >
>> > > > Nonetheless, I think it would be nicer from the user's perspective
>> to
>> > > > settle jar names before 1.0.0. I'd welcome finishing #1991 and
>> > including
>> > > it
>> > > > into 1.0.0 (new RC).
>> > > >
>> > > > Cheers,
>> > > > Dmitri.
>> > > >
>> > > > On Fri, Jul 4, 2025 at 7:27 AM Robert Stupp <sn...@snazy.de> wrote:
>> > > >
>> > > >> I haven't checked the release yet due to other things on my plate.
>> > > >>
>> > > >> With PR #1991 (Add polaris-spark-bundle project to help packing and
>> > > >> publish the Spark Client shadow Jar) [1], the Maven coordinates of
>> the
>> > > >> Spark plugin will change pretty much immediately after 1.0.0,
>> which is
>> > > >> relevant when using Spark's `--packages` option.
>> > > >>
>> > > >> In my vote for RC0, I objected "IIUC having a Maven classifier for
>> the
>> > > >> Spark plugin was considered an issue, however the "end user"
>> > dependency
>> > > >> requires a Maven classifier (`bundle`). ", which is also relevant
>> when
>> > > >> using Spark's `--packages` option.
>> > > >>
>> > > >> Thoughts?
>> > > >>
>> > > >>
>> > > >> [1] https://github.com/apache/polaris/pull/1991
>> > > >>
>> > > >>
>> > > >> On 7/2/25 20:55, Yufei Gu wrote:
>> > > >> > Hi everyone,
>> > > >> >
>> > > >> > I propose that we release the following RC as the official Apache
>> > > >> Polaris
>> > > >> > 1.0.0-incubating release.
>> > > >> >
>> > > >> > This corresponds to the tag: apache-polaris-1.0.0-incubating-rc6
>> > > >> > *
>> > > >> >
>> > > >>
>> > >
>> >
>> https://github.com/apache/polaris/commits/apache-polaris-1.0.0-incubating-rc6
>> > > >> > *
>> > > >> >
>> > > >>
>> > >
>> >
>> https://github.com/apache/polaris/tree/a701f105c5d44565ac0ea86db45edbcebdbed718
>> > > >> > NB: it's exactly the same as RC5 except for this commit:
>> > > >> >
>> > > >>
>> > >
>> >
>> https://github.com/apache/polaris/commit/a701f105c5d44565ac0ea86db45edbcebdbed718
>> > > >> >
>> > > >> > The release tarball, signature, and checksums are here, including
>> > both
>> > > >> > source code and binary distributions:
>> > > >> > *
>> > > >> >
>> > > >>
>> > >
>> >
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/polaris/apache-polaris-1.0.0-incubating/
>> > > >> >
>> > > >> >
>> > > >> > A binary package for Helm chart:
>> > > >> >
>> > > >> > *
>> > > >> >
>> > > >>
>> > >
>> >
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/polaris/helm-chart/1.0.0-incubating/
>> > > >> > NB: File
>> > > >> >
>> > > >>
>> > >
>> >
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/polaris/helm-chart/1.0.0-incubating/polaris-1.0.0-incubating.tgz.prov
>> > > >> > contains
>> > > >> > both signature and checksum for the package. Please verify it
>> with
>> > the
>> > > >> > command `helm verify`.
>> > > >> > The docker images (polaris-server and polaris-admin) will be
>> > published
>> > > >> on
>> > > >> > DockerHub once the release vote passes.
>> > > >> >
>> > > >> > You can find the KEYS file here:
>> > > >> > * https://downloads.apache.org/incubator/polaris/KEYS
>> > > >> >
>> > > >> > Convenience binary artifacts are staged on Nexus. The Maven
>> > repository
>> > > >> URL
>> > > >> > is:
>> > > >> > *
>> > > >>
>> > >
>> >
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachepolaris-1027/
>> > > >> >
>> > > >> > Please download, verify, and test.
>> > > >> >
>> > > >> > Please vote in the next 72 hours.
>> > > >> >
>> > > >> > [ ] +1 Release this as Apache polaris 1.0.0-incubating
>> > > >> > [ ] +0
>> > > >> > [ ] -1 Do not release this because...
>> > > >> >
>> > > >> > Only PPMC members and mentors have binding votes, but other
>> > community
>> > > >> > members are
>> > > >> > encouraged to cast non-binding votes. This vote will pass if
>> there
>> > > are 3
>> > > >> > binding +1 votes and more binding +1 votes than -1 votes.
>> > > >> >
>> > > >> > NB: if this vote passes, a new vote has to be started on the
>> > Incubator
>> > > >> > general mailing list.
>> > > >> >
>> > > >> > Yufei
>> > > >> >
>> > > >> --
>> > > >> Robert Stupp
>> > > >> @snazy
>> > > >>
>> > > >>
>> > >
>> >
>>
>

Reply via email to