Hi everyone, Please take 5 minutes to check the 1.0.0 release notes: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1JDVdQraoEhOIv7agy7WzIuBQdW0_16jW-DBrnanuW7A/edit?tab=t.0. We will publish it right after 1.0.0 was done.
Yufei On Thu, Jun 26, 2025 at 10:31 AM Yufei Gu <flyrain...@gmail.com> wrote: > Thanks for the validation, Dmitri! Great to know that the 1.0.x branch > wasn't impacted. I'd suggest not backporting the fix given it's not broken > to avoid any other implications. > > Yufei > > > On Wed, Jun 25, 2025 at 3:42 PM Dmitri Bourlatchkov <di...@apache.org> > wrote: > >> Update: I tested RC0 and it did NOT have this problem. >> >> The problem appears to exist only on `main`. >> >> The fix in [1945] makes sense in general, though. I'll leave the backport >> decision to you, Yufei. >> >> I guess we'll have to retest with RC1 in any case. >> >> [1945] https://github.com/apache/polaris/pull/1945 >> >> Cheers, >> Dmitri. >> >> On Wed, Jun 25, 2025 at 6:39 PM Yufei Gu <flyrain...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> > Agreed! We also need to change the server side config in that case. >> > >> > Yufei >> > >> > >> > On Wed, Jun 25, 2025 at 3:32 PM Dmitri Bourlatchkov <di...@apache.org> >> > wrote: >> > >> > > Hi Yufei, >> > > >> > > I've just tested the admin tool locally and it does fail with "No bean >> > > found for required type [interface javax.sql.DataSource]" on the >> current >> > > `main`. I do not know what regressed, though. >> > > >> > > I think we have to fix this for 1.0. >> > > >> > > Cheers, >> > > Dmitri. >> > > >> > > On Wed, Jun 25, 2025 at 6:11 PM Yufei Gu <flyrain...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> > > >> > > > Thanks for raising this, Dmitri! One minor question, does this( >> > > > https://github.com/apache/polaris/pull/1945/files#r2167723808) >> affect >> > > > normal use cases beside Quick Start? If that's the case, we could >> have >> > it >> > > > in the 1.0.0 release. >> > > > >> > > > Yufei >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > On Wed, Jun 25, 2025 at 2:57 PM Dmitri Bourlatchkov < >> di...@apache.org> >> > > > wrote: >> > > > >> > > > > Hi All, >> > > > > >> > > > > Do you think we should include this new issue into 1.0? >> > > > > >> > > > > https://github.com/apache/polaris/issues/1943 >> > > > > >> > > > > Thanks, >> > > > > Dmitri. >> > > > > >> > > > > On Mon, Jun 23, 2025 at 9:32 PM Yufei Gu <flyrain...@gmail.com> >> > wrote: >> > > > > >> > > > > > Thanks a lot for everyone working on this! Sent out the 1.0.0 >> RC0 >> > > > release >> > > > > > vote mail! >> > > > > > >> > > > > > Yufei >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > On Mon, Jun 23, 2025 at 6:27 AM Dmitri Bourlatchkov < >> > > di...@apache.org> >> > > > > > wrote: >> > > > > > >> > > > > > > Re: 1: We have PR [1908], but no issue AFAIK. >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > [1908] https://github.com/apache/polaris/pull/1908 >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > Cheers, >> > > > > > > Dmitri. >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > On Mon, Jun 23, 2025 at 9:12 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré < >> > > > j...@nanthrax.net> >> > > > > > > wrote: >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > Hi Robert >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > Yes, 1 has to be sorted out before the release. Do we have >> an >> > > issue >> > > > > > > > about that (beyond the thread discussion) ? I already >> mentioned >> > > my >> > > > > > > > "concern" about the shadow jar in Spark client. It's >> important >> > > but >> > > > it >> > > > > > > > can be improved later. The Maven coordinates are more >> > problematic >> > > > (if >> > > > > > > > we change later). So, let's focus and address the Maven >> > > coordinates >> > > > > > > > first. >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > For 2, I think it's not a blocker now, it has to be fixed >> when >> > > the >> > > > > > > > release will be "published". >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > Thanks ! >> > > > > > > > Regards >> > > > > > > > JB >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > On Mon, Jun 23, 2025 at 1:40 PM Robert Stupp < >> sn...@snazy.de> >> > > > wrote: >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > Not "labeled" as blockers, but two things to clarify: >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > 1. The "[DISCUSS[ Spark Client jars: maven coordinates and >> > > > shading" >> > > > > > > > thread >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > 2. Having the docs for a release appear in a URL >> containing >> > > > > "in-dev" >> > > > > > > > > doesn't feel right. >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > The first one might have implications to the release? >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > On 23.06.25 13:30, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: >> > > > > > > > > > Hi folks, >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > I don't see any Issue or PR with the 1.0-blocker label. >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > I guess we are ready to cut 1.0.0 right ? >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > Regards >> > > > > > > > > > JB >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > On Fri, Jun 20, 2025 at 8:12 PM Yufei Gu < >> > > flyrain...@gmail.com >> > > > > >> > > > > > > wrote: >> > > > > > > > > >> +1 on documenting on the site, which I don't think >> it's a >> > > 1.0 >> > > > > > > > blocker. It's >> > > > > > > > > >> been added into the release notes[1]. >> > > > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > > >> [1]. >> > > > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > >> > >> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1JDVdQraoEhOIv7agy7WzIuBQdW0_16jW-DBrnanuW7A/edit?tab=t.0 >> > > > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > > >> Yufei >> > > > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > > >> On Fri, Jun 20, 2025 at 11:08 AM Dmitri Bourlatchkov < >> > > > > > > > di...@apache.org> >> > > > > > > > > >> wrote: >> > > > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > > >>> Thanks for the heads up, Prashant! >> > > > > > > > > >>> >> > > > > > > > > >>> I agree that it was a good idea to pull Compaction >> > Rollback >> > > > > into >> > > > > > > 1.0. >> > > > > > > > > >>> >> > > > > > > > > >>> Do we want to document this feature, or just mention >> it >> > in >> > > > > > release >> > > > > > > > notes? >> > > > > > > > > >>> >> > > > > > > > > >>> Cheers, >> > > > > > > > > >>> Dmitri. >> > > > > > > > > >>> >> > > > > > > > > >>> On Fri, Jun 20, 2025 at 1:17 PM Prashant Singh >> > > > > > > > > >>> <prashant.si...@snowflake.com.invalid> wrote: >> > > > > > > > > >>> >> > > > > > > > > >>>> Hey folks, >> > > > > > > > > >>>> I want to thank the whole community for jumping in >> for >> > the >> > > > > > reviews >> > > > > > > > of >> > > > > > > > > >>>> Rollback Compaction on conflicts feature here >> > > > > > > > > >>>> < >> > > > > > > > > >>>> >> > > > > > > > > >>> >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > >> > >> https://github.com/apache/polaris/commit/793cf086f1f784c36296b1ea75298a08ce608ef2 >> > > > > > > > > >>>> . >> > > > > > > > > >>>> I am happy to share that it has now merged, since the >> > 1.0 >> > > > boat >> > > > > > has >> > > > > > > > not >> > > > > > > > > >>>> sailed, I cherry-picked the feature to 1.0, it's a >> clean >> > > > > > > > cherry-pick ! >> > > > > > > > > >>>> I believe it will strongly help in Apache Polaris >> > > adoption, >> > > > > and >> > > > > > > > > >>>> sincerely thank everyone who participated ! >> > > > > > > > > >>>> >> > > > > > > > > >>>> Best, >> > > > > > > > > >>>> Prashant Singh >> > > > > > > > > >>>> >> > > > > > > > > >>>> On Fri, Jun 20, 2025 at 9:13 AM Dmitri Bourlatchkov < >> > > > > > > > di...@apache.org> >> > > > > > > > > >>>> wrote: >> > > > > > > > > >>>> >> > > > > > > > > >>>>> Hi All, >> > > > > > > > > >>>>> >> > > > > > > > > >>>>> Posting here for visibility: >> > > > > > > > > >>>>> >> > > > > > >> https://lists.apache.org/thread/0z30f3cfvm41hxlbxgp4fqdpv7mfgnv8 >> > > > > > > > > >>>>> >> > > > > > > > > >>>>> I opened that discussion thread about the new Spark >> > > Client >> > > > > > > plugin. >> > > > > > > > My >> > > > > > > > > >>>>> concern is that the linked >> > > > > > > > > >>>>> PR looks like it may require changing out approach >> to >> > how >> > > > we >> > > > > > > > publish >> > > > > > > > > >>>> Maven >> > > > > > > > > >>>>> artifacts >> > > > > > > > > >>>>> for that client.... Therefore, I'd like to have some >> > more >> > > > > > clarity >> > > > > > > > on >> > > > > > > > > >>> that >> > > > > > > > > >>>>> issue in order to prevent >> > > > > > > > > >>>>> suddenly changing Maven coordinates right after the >> 1.0 >> > > > > > release. >> > > > > > > > > >>>>> >> > > > > > > > > >>>>> Let's use the other thread for technical >> discussions. >> > > This >> > > > > > > message >> > > > > > > > is >> > > > > > > > > >>>> only >> > > > > > > > > >>>>> to flag potential >> > > > > > > > > >>>>> 1.0 impact. >> > > > > > > > > >>>>> >> > > > > > > > > >>>>> Thanks, >> > > > > > > > > >>>>> Dmitri. >> > > > > > > > > >>>>> >> > > > > > > > > >>>>> On Wed, Jun 18, 2025 at 6:13 PM Yufei Gu < >> > > > > flyrain...@gmail.com >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > wrote: >> > > > > > > > > >>>>> >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>> The rename commits( >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>> >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>> >> > > > > > > > > >>> >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > >> > >> https://github.com/apache/polaris/commit/ab228afa4d975faabb7aaf1e8abb0804f5b9d353 >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>> and >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>> >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>> >> > > > > > > > > >>> >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > >> > >> https://github.com/apache/polaris/commit/fccc51ab111b7ee1a0d3c8898e94b0c54bc73d80 >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>> ) >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>> have been cherry-picked to 1.0 branch. >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>> >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>> Yufei >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>> >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>> >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>> On Wed, Jun 18, 2025 at 2:51 PM Yufei Gu < >> > > > > > flyrain...@gmail.com> >> > > > > > > > > >>> wrote: >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> We could re-branch, but folks mentioned there are >> a >> > few >> > > > > > Python >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> commits(like >> > > https://github.com/apache/polaris/pull/1810 >> > > > ) >> > > > > we >> > > > > > > are >> > > > > > > > > >>> not >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> comfortable with having them in 1.0 branch. >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> Feel free to bring up a discussion for more PRs >> you >> > > think >> > > > > > it's >> > > > > > > > 1.0 >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> blockers and needed in 1.0. >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> Yufei >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> On Wed, Jun 18, 2025 at 2:42 PM Dmitri >> Bourlatchkov < >> > > > > > > > > >>>> di...@apache.org> >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> wrote: >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> Hi Yufei, >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> As discussed before, I think it is preferable to >> do >> > > the >> > > > > > > renames >> > > > > > > > > >>> in / >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> before >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> 1.0 because module names affect published Maven >> > > artifact >> > > > > > > names. >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> For that matter, why not re-branch release/1.0.x >> > from >> > > > > > `main`? >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> Thanks, >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> Dmitri. >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> On Wed, Jun 18, 2025 at 5:37 PM Yufei Gu < >> > > > > > > flyrain...@gmail.com> >> > > > > > > > > >>>>> wrote: >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> Hi JB and Dmitri, do we need >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/polaris/pull/1695 >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> in >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> 1.0? We used to agree on bringing it to 1.0 if >> it's >> > > > > ready, >> > > > > > > but >> > > > > > > > > >>> I'm >> > > > > > > > > >>>>> OK >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> with >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> either way. >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> Yufei >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> On Wed, Jun 18, 2025 at 2:31 PM Yufei Gu < >> > > > > > > flyrain...@gmail.com >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>> wrote: >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/polaris/issues/1616 >> was >> > > > > > resolved >> > > > > > > by >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>> #1830, >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> #1834 and #1839. And these three commits are >> > > > > cherry-picked >> > > > > > > to >> > > > > > > > > >>>> 1.0 >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> branch >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> already. >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/polaris/issues/1881 >> was >> > > > just >> > > > > > > > > >>> resolved >> > > > > > > > > >>>>> by >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> #1889, >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> which has been cherry-picked to 1.0 branch. >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> Yufei >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Jun 18, 2025 at 12:02 PM Dmitri >> > > Bourlatchkov < >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> di...@apache.org> >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> wrote: >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> Hi Yufei, et al. >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> It looks like only two 1.0 blockers remain: >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> [1] >> > https://github.com/apache/polaris/issues/1616 >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> [2] >> > https://github.com/apache/polaris/issues/1881 >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> Re: [1] is anybody actively working on it? >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> Also, I believe a lot of relevant changes got >> > > merged >> > > > > > > > > >>>> recently... >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>> WDYT >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> about >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> re-branching `release/1.0.x` from `main` after >> > > > > addressing >> > > > > > > the >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> remaining >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> issues? >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> Thanks, >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> Dmitri. >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, May 15, 2025 at 5:39 PM Yufei Gu < >> > > > > > > > > >>> flyrain...@gmail.com >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> wrote: >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> Hi folks, >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> Many users have been asking about the Polaris >> > > > release, >> > > > > > and >> > > > > > > > > >>> I >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> believe >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> it's >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> critical to have a formal, production-ready >> 1.0 >> > > > > release >> > > > > > > > > >>> ASAP. >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> Thanks >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> to >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> the >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> community’s hard work, we’re very close with >> a >> > few >> > > > > > > > > >>> remaining >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> blockers >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> we >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> need to resolve. >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> To keep things moving, I scheduled a >> community >> > > > meeting >> > > > > > for >> > > > > > > > > >>>> the >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>> 1.0 >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> release >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> next Monday at 9 AM PST. At the same time, >> > > sharing >> > > > > all >> > > > > > > > > >>>> issues >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> marked >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> with >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> 1.0 blocker. We could resolve them here if >> > > possible. >> > > > > > Feel >> > > > > > > > > >>>> free >> > > > > > > > > >>>>> to >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> chime >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> in, >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> remove the blocker tag if you think it's not >> a >> > > > > blocker, >> > > > > > or >> > > > > > > > > >>>> pick >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>> any >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> up. >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks a lot in advance! >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> Here is the list: >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> - Add CI for Python code ( >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> < >> > > > https://github.com/apache/polaris/issues/1058 >> > > > > > > > > >>>> #1058), >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> - Polaris persistence concurrency >> issues >> > > > (#777) >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> < >> > > > https://github.com/apache/polaris/issues/777> >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> - Task handling is incomplete (#774) >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> < >> > > > https://github.com/apache/polaris/issues/774> >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> - Generated files in >> > > > > > regtests/client/python/polaris >> > > > > > > > > >>>>> (#755) >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> < >> > > > https://github.com/apache/polaris/issues/755> >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> - Resources not properly closed, >> > resource & >> > > > > > memory >> > > > > > > > > >>>> leaks >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> (#563) >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> < >> > > > https://github.com/apache/polaris/issues/563> >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> - Make Polaris safe against certain >> > > > unparseable >> > > > > > > > > >>>> locations >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> (#552) >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> < >> > > > https://github.com/apache/polaris/issues/552> >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> - [BUG] Assumption that cache eviction >> > does >> > > > not >> > > > > > > > > >>> happen >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>> (#544) >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> < >> > > > https://github.com/apache/polaris/issues/544> >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> To make it more interactive, you can also >> > comment >> > > on >> > > > > the >> > > > > > > > > >>>> google >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> spreadsheet here: >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> >> > > > > > > > > >>> >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > >> > >> https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1GyLvp2cdYwioOsBwszNWiphZt_IIdo4LIfsZBFV88mc/edit?usp=sharing >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> Yufei >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > >> > >> >
