Hi Dimtri, That generally makes sense to me. For awareness, could you elaborate a bit on how the Polaris server and query engines (like Spark, Trino, etc.) might access the same object storage (e.g., MinIO) via different DNS endpoints?
Yufei On Thu, Jul 31, 2025 at 4:36 AM Alexandre Dutra <adu...@apache.org> wrote: > Hi Dmitri, > > I think your suggestion makes sense. We added something similar in > Nessie long ago, and it is definitely useful. > > I left some comments in the PR. > > Thanks, > Alex > > On Thu, Jul 31, 2025 at 4:12 AM Dmitri Bourlatchkov <di...@apache.org> > wrote: > > > > Hi All, > > > > I propose to add an `endpointInternal` optional parameter to > > AwsStorageConfigInfo > > in PR [2213]. > > > > The main idea is to support deployment edge cases where Polaris Servers > may > > 'see' storage under a different DNS name than query engines. This use > case > > applies mostly to non-AWS S3 storage (e.g. MinIO). > > > > This change is backward-compatible with existing clients and deployed > > catalogs. > > > > Thoughts? > > > > [2213] https://github.com/apache/polaris/pull/2213 > > > > Thanks, > > Dmitri. >
