Why do we remove the 1.1.0-blocker? Yufei
On Wed, Aug 20, 2025 at 11:15 PM Robert Stupp <sn...@snazy.de> wrote: > SGTM > > I'm fine with temporary labels. > > If noone objects, I'd go ahead and remove the unused labels plus these: > - 1.0-blocker > - 1.1.0-blocker > - 1.0.0 bug bash > - IdentityRoleFederation > late on Friday (CEST). > > On Thu, Aug 21, 2025 at 8:09 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré <j...@nanthrax.net> > wrote: > > > > Hi > > > > The proposal is fine, especially about removing unused labels. > > I think we should not be "too strict" about labels either: it could be > > helpful to use labels when preparing a release, temporary to the > > release prep. > > > > So, +1 for a cleanup and "long term labels", but "relax" about the use > > of temporary labels (when it makes sense). > > > > Regards > > JB > > > > On Wed, Aug 20, 2025 at 10:55 AM Robert Stupp <sn...@snazy.de> wrote: > > > > > > Hi all, > > > > > > We currently have a lot of GitHub labels for issues and pull requests. > > > Many of the labels serve(d) a temporary purpose, have no clear meaning > > > or are superfluous as GitHub offers more sophisticated approaches. The > > > following list serves as a proposal to apply to the project's list of > > > labels. > > > > > > Note: There's no way in GitHub to "hide" or "deprecate" a label. > > > > > > Labels used for "release version associations". GitHub offers > > > Milestones for this use case. All the labels can be legitly removed. > > > Generally, IIRC, we agreed on not using a "blocker label". > > > - 1.0-blocker > > > - 1.1.0-blocker > > > - 2.0-blocker: We haven't agreed on any content of version 2.0 - so I > > > don't think this label is needed. > > > - 1.0.0 bug bash: the meaning of this label is unknown > > > > > > Unused labels, should all be removed: > > > - approved: unclear what the meaning should be > > > - wontfix: use GH functionality > > > - dependencies: unused > > > - duplicate: unused > > > - help wanted: unused > > > - invalid: unused > > > - question: unused > > > - rebase: unused > > > > > > Rarely used: > > > - documentation: I think this should be used to associate issues and > > > maybe PRs with changes to the website. Or we rename this label to > > > "website", which seems clearer. > > > - IdentityRoleFederation: only one PR has this, should be removed > > > > > > Used labels, should be good to keep as is: > > > - bug > > > - enhancement > > > - proposal > > > - good first issue > > > - renovate-polaris: dependency bumps by Renovate > > > - Stale: stale-PRs workflow > > > > > > > > > Robert >
