Hi Dimitri, > add another integration point that would handle the construction of PolarisStorageConfigurationInfo and work in conjunction with PolarisStorageIntegrationProvider
Could you share more details about it? Or we can just review the PR. Yufei On Wed, Aug 20, 2025 at 10:59 PM Jean-Baptiste Onofré <j...@nanthrax.net> wrote: > Hi Dmitri > > It looks good to me. I'm looking forward the PR to have a better > understanding of the proposal. > > Thanks ! > Regards > JB > > On Mon, Aug 18, 2025 at 6:08 PM Dmitri Bourlatchkov <di...@apache.org> > wrote: > > > > Hi All, > > > > Currently Polaris core code has a very specific mechanism for > > extracting PolarisStorageConfigurationInfo from entities. The config > value > > is then passed to a PolarisStorageIntegrationProvider. > > > > Now, PolarisStorageIntegrationProvider is pluggable and works with the > > config extracted from entities by Polaris core. I am proposing to add > > another integration point that would handle the construction > > of PolarisStorageConfigurationInfo and work in conjunction > > with PolarisStorageIntegrationProvider. Having both of these actions > > customizable is intended to allow more flexibility (and better code > > alignment) in handling storage integrations in downstream projects. > > > > I'm working on a PR to provide a concrete suggestion. > > > > Sending this email to proactively ask if there are any concerns with this > > approach. > > > > WDYT? > > > > Thanks, > > Dmitri. >
