I'm back to repoing the error again. Again with no changes other than only
running with no-build cache. I do think something is probably not right
here but I don't think it's fundamental to the Polaris project.

On Thu, Sep 4, 2025 at 10:37 AM Dmitri Bourlatchkov <di...@apache.org>
wrote:

> Thanks for tracking the issue down to Docker Desktop, Pierre!
>
> Given that only one of many possible docker environments is affected, I
> agree that we should not block the release on this issue.
>
> Cheers,
> Dmitri.
>
> On Thu, Sep 4, 2025 at 10:13 AM Pierre Laporte <pie...@pingtimeout.fr>
> wrote:
>
> > Just a heads up, I was able to reproduce the issue when I switched to
> > Docker Desktop.  But when I tested the build with OrbStack and Podman
> > Desktop, it went well.  So it seems that the issue happens only on
> > MacOs+Docker Desktop.  Adding that in #2501.  I also don't think we
> should
> > consider this as a release blocker.
> >
> > @Russel or @Yufei by any chance, could you confirm that the build passes
> > with Podman Desktop on your end too?
> >
> > --
> >
> > Pierre
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Sep 4, 2025 at 6:46 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré <j...@nanthrax.net>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Hi
> > >
> > > I'm a little bit worried by this issue as it doesn't seem "isolated"
> > > (we can reproduce the issue on at least three machines; Russ, Yufei
> > > and my Mac).
> > >
> > > I propose:
> > > 1. Let's take a look on the issue created by Russell and see if we can
> > > find a fix quickly (I will investigate today).
> > > 2. If we have a quick fix, I would propose to do a RC1.
> > > 3. If the fix is not obvious, then, let's aim for the 1.2.0-incubating
> > > release.
> > >
> > > Regards
> > > JB
> > >
> > > On Thu, Sep 4, 2025 at 4:46 AM Russell Spitzer
> > > <russell.spit...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Created an issue - https://github.com/apache/polaris/issues/2501
> > > > Done looking into this for now but it seems like the client we are
> > making
> > > > to contact the container is failing to authenticate correctly or
> > > > possibly just using the wrong configuration in some other way. The
> > > > container starts fine and everything looks ok but the client we
> create
> > > > just get' a 403 for all requests I tried.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Wed, Sep 3, 2025 at 7:16 PM Russell Spitzer <
> > > russell.spit...@gmail.com>
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Full error in the error report which doesn't seem to match the
> StdErr
> > > > > message
> > > > >
> > > > > org.junit.jupiter.api.extension.ParameterResolutionException:
> Failed
> > > to resolve parameter
> > [org.apache.polaris.service.it.env.PolarisApiEndpoints
> > > arg0] in method [static void org.apache.polaris.service.it
> >
> .test.PolarisRestCatalogIntegrationBase.setup(org.apache.polaris.service.it.env.PolarisApiEndpoints,org.apache.polaris.service.it.env.ClientPrincipal)]:
> > > System property not set correctly: quarkus.http.test-port
> > > > >       at java.base@21.0.7
> > > /java.util.ArrayList.forEach(ArrayList.java:1596)
> > > > >       Suppressed: java.lang.NullPointerException: Cannot invoke
> > > "org.apache.polaris.service.it.env.PolarisClient.close()" because
> > >
> >
> "org.apache.polaris.service.it.test.PolarisRestCatalogIntegrationBase.client"
> > > is null
> > > > >               at org.apache.polaris.service.it
> > >
> >
> .test.PolarisRestCatalogIntegrationBase.close(PolarisRestCatalogIntegrationBase.java:224)
> > > > >               at
> > > java.base/java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:580)
> > > > >               at
> > > java.base/java.util.ArrayList.forEach(ArrayList.java:1596)
> > > > >               at
> > >
> >
> java.base/java.util.Collections$UnmodifiableCollection.forEach(Collections.java:1116)
> > > > >               ... 1 more
> > > > > Caused by: java.lang.NullPointerException: System property not set
> > > correctly: quarkus.http.test-port
> > > > >       at
> java.base/java.util.Objects.requireNonNull(Objects.java:259)
> > > > >       at org.apache.polaris.service.it
> > > .ServerManager.getQuarkusTestPort(ServerManager.java:55)
> > > > >       at org.apache.polaris.service.it
> > > .ServerManager$1.baseUri(ServerManager.java:37)
> > > > >       at org.apache.polaris.service.it
> > >
> >
> .ext.PolarisIntegrationTestExtension$Env.<init>(PolarisIntegrationTestExtension.java:95)
> > > > >       at org.apache.polaris.service.it
> > >
> >
> .ext.PolarisIntegrationTestExtension.lambda$env$0(PolarisIntegrationTestExtension.java:72)
> > > > >       at org.apache.polaris.service.it
> > >
> >
> .ext.PolarisIntegrationTestExtension.env(PolarisIntegrationTestExtension.java:71)
> > > > >       at org.apache.polaris.service.it
> > >
> >
> .ext.PolarisIntegrationTestExtension.resolveParameter(PolarisIntegrationTestExtension.java:56)
> > > > >       ... 1 more
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > On Wed, Sep 3, 2025 at 7:13 PM Russell Spitzer <
> > > russell.spit...@gmail.com>
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > >> I wouldn't consider it a blocker, but we should aim for tests that
> > are
> > > > >> more or less environment independent (or
> > > > >> at least work on all voting dev's machines :) )
> > > > >>
> > > > >> If it is a DNS resolution error it's probably just binding to a
> > > resolved
> > > > >> ip rather than loopback. We had a similar
> > > > >> issue in Iceberg which was fixed here.
> > > > >>
> > > > >> https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/13101
> > > > >>
> > > > >> On Wed, Sep 3, 2025 at 6:13 PM Dmitri Bourlatchkov
> > > > >> <dmitri.bourlatch...@dremio.com.invalid> wrote:
> > > > >>
> > > > >>> +1 (binding)
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> Verified:
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> * Checksums
> > > > >>> * Signatures
> > > > >>> * Iceberg Catalog smoke test from the bundled binary dist with
> > MinIO
> > > +
> > > > >>> PostgreSQL and Spark (CTAS/select)
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> Cheers,
> > > > >>> Dmitri.
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> On Sun, Aug 31, 2025 at 11:36 PM Jean-Baptiste Onofré <
> > > j...@nanthrax.net>
> > > > >>> wrote:
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> > Hi everyone,
> > > > >>> >
> > > > >>> > I propose that we release the following RC as the official
> > > > >>> > Apache Polaris 1.1.0-incubating release.
> > > > >>> >
> > > > >>> > * This corresponds to the tag:
> > apache-polaris-1.1.0-incubating-rc0
> > > > >>> > *
> > > > >>> >
> > > > >>>
> > >
> >
> https://github.com/apache/polaris/commits/apache-polaris-1.1.0-incubating-rc0
> > > > >>> > *
> > > > >>> >
> > > > >>>
> > >
> >
> https://github.com/apache/polaris/tree/9c635e14fb7497cd4d40b79075048af49350d622
> > > > >>> >
> > > > >>> > The release tarball, signature, and checksums are here:
> > > > >>> > *
> > > > >>> >
> > > > >>>
> > >
> >
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/polaris/1.1.0-incubating
> > > > >>> >
> > > > >>> > Helm charts are available on:
> > > > >>> > *
> > > > >>> >
> > > > >>>
> > >
> >
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/polaris/helm-chart/1.1.0-incubating
> > > > >>> > NB: you have to build the Docker images locally in order to
> test
> > > Helm
> > > > >>> > charts.
> > > > >>> >
> > > > >>> > You can find the KEYS file here:
> > > > >>> > * https://downloads.apache.org/incubator/polaris/KEYS
> > > > >>> >
> > > > >>> > Convenience binary artifacts are staged on Nexus. The Maven
> > > > >>> > repositories URLs are:
> > > > >>> > *
> > > > >>> >
> > > > >>>
> > >
> >
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachepolaris-1030/
> > > > >>> >
> > > > >>> > Please download, verify, and test.
> > > > >>> >
> > > > >>> > Please vote in the next 72 hours.
> > > > >>> >
> > > > >>> > [ ] +1 Release this as Apache polaris x.y.z
> > > > >>> > [ ] +0
> > > > >>> > [ ] -1 Do not release this because...
> > > > >>> >
> > > > >>> > Only PPMC members and mentors have binding votes, but other
> > > community
> > > > >>> > members are
> > > > >>> > encouraged to cast non-binding votes. This vote will pass if
> > there
> > > are
> > > > >>> > 3 binding +1 votes and more binding +1 votes than -1 votes.
> > > > >>> >
> > > > >>> > NB: if this vote passes, a new vote has to be started on the
> > > Incubator
> > > > >>> > general mailing
> > > > >>> > list.
> > > > >>> >
> > > > >>> > Regards
> > > > >>> > JB
> > > > >>> >
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>
> > >
> >
>

Reply via email to