Thank you JB & Alex ! Re: semi automatic effort, I propose also to move forward on the GH Release Action if the GH Release Action is ready and happy to give it a spin !
Re: I have proactively assigned the 1.2.0 milestone to some of my PRs that I think could be part of 1.2.0. Thank you Alex for also starting the thread for this ! I hope these get in soon :) ! Re: What do we want to do with remote signing? I am not sure of next steps here, how about we see if we can get in by the rc cutoff to catch 1.2 train. Again thank you everyone for your feedbacks looking forward to 1.2 release I also added an iceberg version bump to 1.10 in this track, as our tests were failing with dependabot update, it will be nice to include this as well ! https://github.com/apache/polaris/pull/2586 Best, Prashant Singh On Tue, Sep 16, 2025 at 9:53 AM Alexandre Dutra <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Prashant, hi all, > > Thanks for driving the 1.2 release effort! > > I have proactively assigned the 1.2.0 milestone to some of my PRs that > I think could be part of 1.2.0. > > What do we want to do with remote signing? I think we could include > the current PR in experimental / preview state, but I'm fine holding > off until we finish the implementation if you think that's safer. > > Thanks, > Alex > > On Tue, Sep 16, 2025 at 8:06 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > Hi > > > > Thanks for starting this ! It makes to me. > > > > And yes, it makes sense to start the prep/triage now. > > > > As part of semi auromatic effort, I propose also to move forward on the > GH > > Release Action. > > > > Regards > > JB > > > > Le mar. 16 sept. 2025 à 02:16, Prashant Singh > > <[email protected]> a écrit : > > > > > Ack ! Thank you for the feedback Dmitri ! > > > Tracking 1.2 milestones > > > < > > > > https://github.com/apache/polaris/issues?q=is%3Aissue%20state%3Aopen%20milestone%3A1.2.0 > > > > > > > for the release (will check the current status of the tickets / prs > already > > > tagged with the 1.2 release and check with all) seems reasonable to me > ! > > > > > > Best, > > > Prashant Singh > > > > > > On Mon, Sep 15, 2025 at 2:42 PM Dmitri Bourlatchkov <[email protected]> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > Thanks for volunteering to drive the 1.2 release, Prashant! > > > > > > > > I believe we previously discussed using the "release train" model, so > > > > whatever is committed by the branch time, gets released :) > > > > > > > > I propose to use the 1.2.0 GH milestone for tracking PRs and Issues > that > > > > need special attention during the 1.2 release (e.g. blockers). > > > > > > > > I believe this process worked fairly well for the 1.1.0 release :) > > > > > > > > Cheers, > > > > Dmitri. > > > > > > > > On Mon, Sep 15, 2025 at 4:48 PM Prashant Singh > > > > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > Hey All, > > > > > > > > > > Thank you everyone for working on the 1.1 release now since it is > > > > *almost* > > > > > done and we planned on a monthly release cadence, I was wondering > if we > > > > > should start thinking of a 1.2 release and start working towards > > > > > identifying what we want to target for 1.2. > > > > > > > > > > Given that I would also like to volunteer as 1.2 release manager, > > > please > > > > > let me know your thoughts ! > > > > > > > > > > Best, > > > > > Prashant Singh > > > > > > > > > > > > >
