+1(binding)

Here are things I verified:
1. Checksums, signatures
2. Build passed with a known issue in an env of MacOS + Docker, more
details can be found in https://github.com/apache/polaris/issues/2501.
3. Run the command "bin/admin" and "bin/server" in the binary distribution
4. Helm installation

Yufei


On Mon, Oct 13, 2025 at 11:16 AM Prashant Singh
<[email protected]> wrote:

> Hi everyone,
>
> I propose that we release the following RC as the official
> Apache Polaris 1.2.0-incubating release.
>
> * This corresponds to the tag: apache-polaris-1.2.0-incubating-rc1
> *
>
> https://github.com/apache/polaris/commits/apache-polaris-1.2.0-incubating-rc1
> *
>
> https://github.com/apache/polaris/tree/b7188a07511935e7c9c64128dc047107c26f97f6
>
> The release tarball, signature, and checksums are here:
> *
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/polaris/1.2.0-incubating
>
> Helm charts are available on:
> * https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/polaris/helm-chart
>
> You can find the KEYS file here:
> * https://downloads.apache.org/incubator/polaris/KEYS
>
> Convenience binary artifacts are staged on Nexus. The Maven
> repositories URLs are:
> *
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachepolaris-1032/
> <https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachepolaris-1031/
> >
> Compared to RC-0 this has the following additional changes :
> - CHANGELOG update to include a breaking change :
> https://github.com/apache/polaris/pull/2792
> - Adjust cloudprovider reg tests per the breaking change :
>  https://github.com/apache/polaris/pull/2793
> <https://github.com/apache/polaris/pull/2793>
>
> Please download, verify, and test.
>
> Please vote in the next 72 hours.
>
> [ ] +1 Release this as Apache Polaris 1.2.0-incubating
> [ ] +0
> [ ] -1 Do not release this because...
>
> Only PPMC members and mentors have binding votes, but other community
> members are encouraged to cast non-binding votes. This vote will pass if
> there are
> 3 binding +1 votes and more binding +1 votes than -1 votes.
>
> Best,
> Prashant Singh
>

Reply via email to