Just wanna check, do we continue using this thread for the rename vote or close this one, and open another vote with clarification?
Yufei On Thu, Oct 16, 2025 at 10:38 PM Jean-Baptiste Onofré <[email protected]> wrote: > As discussed yesterday and just to remind the good practice: > > 1. A vote is not "always" required, lazy consensus can be used, > without a need for a vote > 2. A vote is to answer a "closed" question, not choose between open a, > b, c. A vote should be yes for that, not for that. > 3. A vote email should have [VOTE] in the subject (the case here), and > list +1/-1 with the meaning. > > So, for this vote, it should be: > > +1 (use the pypolaris as Polaris CLI package name) > 0 (I don't care) > -1 (don't see pypolaris because ...) > > I vote +1 (binding) here, with the comment that if CLI is embedded in > the Polaris distribution, pypolaris would sound like a weird name (but > we can change while assembling the binary distribution). > > Regards > JB > > On Wed, Oct 15, 2025 at 2:19 PM Artur Rakhmatulin > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Hello everyone. > > I would like to open a VOTE for using "pypolaris" as the name of the > > Apache Polaris CLI tool that will be available after installing the > > Apache Polaris python distribution. > > ``` > > pip install apache-polaris > > pypolaris --help > > ``` > > Motivation: > > -avoid collisions with the existing ./polaris executable in the Apache > > Polaris project > > -avoid name collisions with other tools not related to Apache Polaris > > -ease of use > > -Initial Issue - Package Python CLI tool in the binary distribution [1] > > -How it might look like I reflected in the draft PR. Feel free to > > comment [2] > > [1]: https://github.com/apache/polaris/issues/2419 > > [2]: https://github.com/apache/polaris/pull/2812 > > >
