Hi Travis, The proposal doc looks pretty good to me. I did not get a chance to look deep into details, but in general I second Michael's opinion.
Cheers, Dmitri. On Thu, Sep 25, 2025 at 1:59 PM Michael Collado <[email protected]> wrote: > Adding finer-grained authorization privileges sounds great to me. The main > concern I would have is ensuring that existing grant records continue to > work, so as long as it's backward compatible for existing deployments, I'm > in favor. > > Mike > > On Thu, Sep 18, 2025 at 5:06 PM Travis Bowen > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > > I've been investigating ideas on how to have finer grained authorization > > checks on the various types of updates that can be present in an update > > table request in Polaris. > > > > I wrote a doc that represents a proposal that I think could achieve this > in > > a backwards compatible manner along with some of my reasons on why it > seems > > valuable. > > > > Would love to get input and start a discussion around this as it could be > > valuable for both me and others as well. > > > > > > > https://docs.google.com/document/d/1LRB0LDevc6EQa0NWiLHi-jKmrwNA_XXWiHKfskZ6VwU/edit?usp=sharing > > > > Thanks! > > Travis > > >
