Hi Prashant I'm doing a check on the "legal" (LICENSE, NOTICE, etc in the packages).
I will eventually open PRs. I will keep you posted. Regards JB On Tue, Oct 7, 2025 at 8:34 AM Prashant Singh <[email protected]> wrote: > > Thank you everyone for your awesome work, I wanted to share that all the > 1.2 critical fixes are in ! > At this point the window for including more changes 1.2 is closed (obvious > if anything critical comes up, we should definitely discuss and make a call > on it together). > I will start prepping the RC for the release and share it when ready. > > Again thanks a ton to everyone ! > > Best, > Prashant Singh > > > > On Fri, Sep 26, 2025 at 5:05 PM Honah J. <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Hi Prashant, > > > > Yes, that sounds great! The remaining task is mostly to finalize a proper > > release process for python CLI. But if we discover something more later, it > > definitely makes sense to target the next. > > > > Best, > > Jonas > > > > On Fri, Sep 26, 2025 at 6:58 PM Prashant Singh > > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > Hey Jonas, > > > Thank you for bringing this up, i think we are still waiting on some of > > the > > > fixes which are required for 1.2 > > > if its gets in by the time these get resolved, happy to include this in > > > 1.2, though if its gonna take some more time or requires some further > > > discussion, > > > imho then we can wait for it 1.3 which would just next end of october, > > WDYT > > > ? > > > > > > Best, > > > Prashant Singh > > > > > > On Fri, Sep 26, 2025 at 1:28 PM Honah J. <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > Hi Prashant, > > > > > > > > Thanks for driving this! Sorry for the lateness that I did not realize > > > > that Python CLI binary distribution [2419] is not currently tracked in > > > > milestone 1.2.0. The goal is to make it easier for users to use our CLI > > > to > > > > interact with polaris (with simple pip install instead of cloning the > > > whole > > > > project). There has been much progress from Yong and Yufei and I think > > we > > > > are close. WDYT about including this to 1.2.0 milestone? > > > > > > > > [2419]: https://github.com/apache/polaris/issues/2419 > > > > <https://github.com/apache/polaris/issues/2419> > > > > > > > > Thanks! > > > > Jonas > > > > > > > > On Fri, Sep 26, 2025 at 2:28 PM Dmitri Bourlatchkov <[email protected]> > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > Hi Prashant, > > > > > > > > > > I've also marked [2696] for 1.2.0. The reason is that it's a > > follow-up > > > PR > > > > > to something that got recently merged to `main` and we need to > > resolve > > > it > > > > > to avoid possible inconvenience (as discussed in the PRs). > > > > > > > > > > [2696] https://github.com/apache/polaris/pull/2696 > > > > > > > > > > Cheers, > > > > > Dmitri. > > > > > > > > > > On Fri, Sep 26, 2025 at 12:40 PM Prashant Singh > > > > > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > Thank you everyone ! for you inputs > > > > > > I see all PRs from Alex marked for 1.2 is merged, and as per > > > feedback i > > > > > > moved issues / features marked for 1.2 to either 1.3 or simply > > > removed > > > > > > milestones for the features we haven't started > > > > > > developing on. > > > > > > My current understanding is that we are waiting for : > > > > > > [1] PR - https://github.com/apache/polaris/pull/2653 > > > > > > [2] Issue - https://github.com/apache/polaris/issues/2671 so that > > > > > rolling > > > > > > upgrades are handled correctly (we have a thread for this already) > > > > > > > > > > > > If this understanding is correct, then post resolution of [1] and > > [2] > > > > we > > > > > > should be good to move forward with 1.2 rc cut. > > > > > > Please let me know if I am missing anything, if all are ok i will > > > track > > > > > > these 2 to move forward with 1.2 rc cut to continue our monthly > > > release > > > > > > train model. > > > > > > > > > > > > Best, > > > > > > Prashant Singh > > > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Sep 16, 2025 at 1:58 PM Prashant Singh < > > > > > > [email protected]> > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thank you JB & Alex ! > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Re: semi automatic effort, I propose also to move forward on the > > GH > > > > > > > Release Action > > > > > > > if the GH Release Action is ready and happy to give it a spin ! > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Re: I have proactively assigned the 1.2.0 milestone to some of my > > > PRs > > > > > > that > > > > > > > I think could be part of 1.2.0. > > > > > > > Thank you Alex for also starting the thread for this ! I hope > > these > > > > get > > > > > > in > > > > > > > soon :) ! > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Re: What do we want to do with remote signing? > > > > > > > I am not sure of next steps here, how about we see if we can get > > in > > > > by > > > > > > the > > > > > > > rc cutoff to catch 1.2 train. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Again thank you everyone for your feedbacks looking forward to > > 1.2 > > > > > > release > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I also added an iceberg version bump to 1.10 in this track, as > > our > > > > > tests > > > > > > > were failing with dependabot update, it will be nice to include > > > this > > > > as > > > > > > > well ! > > > > > > > https://github.com/apache/polaris/pull/2586 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Best, > > > > > > > Prashant Singh > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Sep 16, 2025 at 9:53 AM Alexandre Dutra < > > [email protected] > > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> Hi Prashant, hi all, > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> Thanks for driving the 1.2 release effort! > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> I have proactively assigned the 1.2.0 milestone to some of my > > PRs > > > > that > > > > > > >> I think could be part of 1.2.0. > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> What do we want to do with remote signing? I think we could > > > include > > > > > > >> the current PR in experimental / preview state, but I'm fine > > > holding > > > > > > >> off until we finish the implementation if you think that's > > safer. > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> Thanks, > > > > > > >> Alex > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> On Tue, Sep 16, 2025 at 8:06 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré < > > > > [email protected] > > > > > > > > > > > > >> wrote: > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > Hi > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > Thanks for starting this ! It makes to me. > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > And yes, it makes sense to start the prep/triage now. > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > As part of semi auromatic effort, I propose also to move > > forward > > > > on > > > > > > the > > > > > > >> GH > > > > > > >> > Release Action. > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > Regards > > > > > > >> > JB > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > Le mar. 16 sept. 2025 à 02:16, Prashant Singh > > > > > > >> > <[email protected]> a écrit : > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > Ack ! Thank you for the feedback Dmitri ! > > > > > > >> > > Tracking 1.2 milestones > > > > > > >> > > < > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://github.com/apache/polaris/issues?q=is%3Aissue%20state%3Aopen%20milestone%3A1.2.0 > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > for the release (will check the current status of the > > tickets > > > / > > > > > prs > > > > > > >> already > > > > > > >> > > tagged with the 1.2 release and check with all) seems > > > reasonable > > > > > to > > > > > > >> me ! > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > Best, > > > > > > >> > > Prashant Singh > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > On Mon, Sep 15, 2025 at 2:42 PM Dmitri Bourlatchkov < > > > > > > [email protected] > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > wrote: > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > Thanks for volunteering to drive the 1.2 release, > > Prashant! > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > I believe we previously discussed using the "release > > train" > > > > > model, > > > > > > >> so > > > > > > >> > > > whatever is committed by the branch time, gets released :) > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > I propose to use the 1.2.0 GH milestone for tracking PRs > > and > > > > > > Issues > > > > > > >> that > > > > > > >> > > > need special attention during the 1.2 release (e.g. > > > blockers). > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > I believe this process worked fairly well for the 1.1.0 > > > > release > > > > > :) > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > Cheers, > > > > > > >> > > > Dmitri. > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > On Mon, Sep 15, 2025 at 4:48 PM Prashant Singh > > > > > > >> > > > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > Hey All, > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > Thank you everyone for working on the 1.1 release now > > > since > > > > it > > > > > > is > > > > > > >> > > > *almost* > > > > > > >> > > > > done and we planned on a monthly release cadence, I was > > > > > > wondering > > > > > > >> if we > > > > > > >> > > > > should start thinking of a 1.2 release and start working > > > > > towards > > > > > > >> > > > > identifying what we want to target for 1.2. > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > Given that I would also like to volunteer as 1.2 release > > > > > > manager, > > > > > > >> > > please > > > > > > >> > > > > let me know your thoughts ! > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > Best, > > > > > > >> > > > > Prashant Singh > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
