Thanks Huaxin for restarting the discussion. The direction looks good to me.
Should we also consider how this plays with Polaris REST endpoints beyond IRC, e.g., catalog, policy, principal, role, etc, to keep the behavior consistent across the REST API surface area? Yufei On Mon, Nov 24, 2025 at 1:17 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Huaxin, > > Thanks for the ping and the updated proposal documents. > > We will review these and provide feedback shortly. > > Regards, > JB > > On Sun, Nov 23, 2025 at 1:50 AM huaxin gao <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Hi all, > > I would like to restart the discussion on Idempotency-Key support in > > Polaris. This proposal focuses on Polaris server-side behavior and > > implementation details, with the Iceberg spec as the baseline API > contract. > > Thanks for your review and feedback. > > > > Polaris Idempotency Key Proposal > > < > https://docs.google.com/document/d/1ToMMziFIa7DNJ6CxR5RSEg1dgJSS1zFzZfbngDz-EeU/edit?tab=t.0#heading=h.ecn4cggb6uy7 > > > > > > Iceberg Idempotency Key Proposal > > < > https://docs.google.com/document/d/1WyiIk08JRe8AjWh63txIP4i2xcIUHYQWFrF_1CCS3uw/edit?tab=t.0#heading=h.jfecktgonj1i > > > > > > Best, > > Huaxin >
