Hi Adam, Thanks a lot for putting this together! I really appreciate the effort to make the sprint more interactive and democratic. It’s great that everyone gets a chance to chime in and surface topics they care about.
One small thought: if the final number of topics ends up being fairly limited, breakout sessions may not be strictly necessary. We have enough time, about 6 hours, and some topics may deserve everyone's attention. Also, while broad participation is great, we might consider lightly curating the final topic list to ensure the discussions stay focused and high-value for the group. Overall, the direction looks great to me. Thanks again for driving this! Yufei On Tue, Nov 25, 2025 at 9:28 AM Adam Christian < [email protected]> wrote: > Howdy folks! > > I am excited about the Polaris Community Sprint coming up on Dec 16th [1]. > I wanted to propose an agenda and solicit feedback. You can find my > proposal here [2]. I believe there are pros & cons for this approach: > > Pros: > - It's more democratic for the folks attending because participants are > able to vote on what they want to hear. > - It's more interactive than just a lecture-and-questions approach. > - Participants can choose where they spend their time. > - Sessions are of a sizeable length to speak in-depth about topics. > > Cons: > - It's a bit harder for facilitators to organize as it requires some > organization. > > [1] - https://luma.com/wqh2mqxx?tk=DLj5yC > [2] - > > https://docs.google.com/document/d/1XEcwlxfuDGS4oupUzlz-sYdqLFD-mcslD1gSYET8Xeo/edit?tab=t.0 > > What do y'all think? > > Go community, > > Adam >
