Hi all,

I've created the document [1] explaining the proposal for release
automation for polaris-tools projects. The doc is open for comments.
TL;DR is in the first message of this thread [2].

Robert

[1] 
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1MpovNXHFxqC1rxw_WhekQujDSj_zOAl4AN2QyFkX23k
[2] https://lists.apache.org/thread/7tlmzwpdc9m4p4dx79jrydxs3x60m875

On Fri, Nov 21, 2025 at 3:24 PM Adam Christian
<[email protected]> wrote:
>
> That would be fantastic, Robert! I know that the AppRunner, Iceberg Catalog
> Migrator, and the MCP Server would benefit from this greatly!
>
> Go community,
>
> Adam
>
> On Thu, Nov 20, 2025 at 7:07 PM Yufei Gu <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > Hi Robert,
> >
> > Thanks so much for driving this! The direction looks great, having a
> > unified but tool-agnostic release flow will make things much smoother for
> > everyone.
> >
> > Excited to see the detailed proposal and happy to help test things out once
> > it’s ready.
> >
> > Yufei
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Nov 20, 2025 at 10:26 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré <[email protected]>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > The ability to release each tool individually is a great improvement!
> > >
> > > I agree that each tool should have its specific method for handling
> > > release resources.
> > >
> > > Thanks, and I look forward to seeing the detailed proposal.
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > > JB
> > >
> > > On Thu, Nov 20, 2025 at 3:23 AM Robert Stupp <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Hi all,
> > > >
> > > > I think there is a way to have release automation for polaris-tools
> > > > similar to the release automation for the polaris repo.
> > > >
> > > > UX change TL;DR: Start drafting a release with two input parameters:
> > > > 1. Tool name
> > > > 2. Tool version
> > > > All other steps remain the same as for the polaris repo.
> > > >
> > > > The major implementation difference is that the polaris-tools
> > > > workflows become agnostic to which artifacts a specific tool builds
> > > > (Maven stuff, tarballs/zip, Python stuff, Docker images, Helm charts).
> > > >
> > > > The effort for each tool would be pretty low, a few very simple
> > > > tool-specific shell scripts.
> > > >
> > > > I will come up with a more detailed proposal soon.
> > > >
> > > > Robert
> > >
> >

Reply via email to