Hi all are stateless sessions of hibernate that slow compared to JDBC - it shouldn't if well configured/used, in particular with the pattern used right now which still does object projection? idea behind is that enabling more database sounds the way to go to get more audience - I'd love to use MSSQL cause it is what we have there and know how to run instead of adding postgres just for polaris for ex. if stateless mode is ok then H2 & friends are no brainer to keep.
Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau <https://x.com/rmannibucau> | .NET Blog <https://dotnetbirdie.github.io/> | Blog <https://rmannibucau.github.io/> | Old Blog <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibucau> | LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Book <https://www.packtpub.com/en-us/product/java-ee-8-high-performance-9781788473064> Javaccino founder (Java/.NET service - contact via linkedin) Le ven. 6 févr. 2026 à 21:47, Russell Spitzer <[email protected]> a écrit : > +1 Remove H2, Postgres setup in docker is only slightly more annoying > > On Fri, Feb 6, 2026 at 1:23 PM Jean-Baptiste Onofré <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > Hi > > > > I guess the purpose is mostly for test/local "demo" purposes without the > > need of RDBMS service. > > That said, with Docker, it's not very painful to have PostgreSQL > including > > for local test/demo use cases. > > > > I agree to remove H2. > > > > Regards > > JB > > > > On Fri, Feb 6, 2026 at 7:08 PM Dmitri Bourlatchkov <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > > > Hi All, > > > > > > I'm just wondering whether people find value in maintaining H2 schemas. > > > > > > I doubt H2 has production use cases. Polaris builds include it only in > > test > > > configurations, it seems. > > > > > > Would it be reasonable to drop H2 to concentrate on PostgreSQL? > > > > > > WDYT? > > > > > > Thanks, > > > Dmitri. > > > > > >
