Hi JB, So, can any contributor just go ahead and create an account on Artifact Hub, then declare the `apache-polaris` repo ID?
If so, I'm happy to do it. Thanks, Alex On Mon, Feb 9, 2026 at 5:27 PM Jean-Baptiste Onofré <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi > > If there's no need to have an account for the release process, no need to > have the ASF Infra. > > Regards > JB > > On Mon, Feb 9, 2026 at 4:12 PM Dmitri Bourlatchkov <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Hi JB, > > > > Would it still be the Infra team who opens and manges the Polaris account > > on Artifact Hub or PPMC? > > > > Thanks, > > Dmitri. > > > > On Mon, Feb 9, 2026 at 7:19 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > > > Ah ok. I thought that we need an account to “link” to our repository. > > > > > > Good then. > > > > > > Regards > > > JB > > > > > > Le lun. 9 févr. 2026 à 13:17, Alexandre Dutra <[email protected]> a > > écrit > > > : > > > > > > > Hi JB, > > > > > > > > I think with Artifact Hub the workflow is different: we don't need to > > > > "push" anything to Artifact Hub during the release, so credentials are > > > > not required at that moment. The chart stays hosted where it is today, > > > > and Artifact Hub would "discover" it thanks to the chart annotations > > > > and the artifacthub-repo.yml file. > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > Alex > > > > > > > > On Mon, Feb 9, 2026 at 12:59 PM Jean-Baptiste Onofré <[email protected]> > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Hi > > > > > > > > > > To be part of the automatic release, I guess we should ask infra to > > > > create > > > > > an account and give us via secret (as we do for DockerHub). > > > > > It’s basically similar to what we do for DockerHub and PyPi (external > > > > > resources from The ASF, ASF deals with Nexus and dist). > > > > > > > > > > Regards > > > > > JB > > > > > > > > > > Le lun. 9 févr. 2026 à 11:37, Alexandre Dutra <[email protected]> a > > > > écrit : > > > > > > > > > > > Hi all, > > > > > > > > > > > > A new PR is proposing to reference the Polaris Helm chart on > > Artifact > > > > Hub > > > > > > [1]. > > > > > > > > > > > > I think the idea is great, but since it requires some coordination > > > and > > > > > > changes to the release process, I thought it would be good to > > discuss > > > > > > this idea here. > > > > > > > > > > > > The changes in the PR are just the first step. After that 2 more > > > steps > > > > > > would be required: > > > > > > > > > > > > 1) Registration: someone in the team must manually register the > > > > > > Polaris Helm repository in Artifact Hub. > > > > > > > > > > > > 2) The semi-automated release scripts would need to be modified, > > > > > > notably to copy the new artifacthub-repo.yml file to the Helm chart > > > > > > repository root (at the same level as index.yaml). > > > > > > > > > > > > There might be more steps involved that I'm not aware of. > > > > > > > > > > > > What do you all think? Should we proceed with this? > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > Alex > > > > > > > > > > > > [1]: https://github.com/apache/polaris/issues/3545 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
