Hi JB - coming back from vacation and picking this back up :) I tried using ASF self-serve portal and ran into some issues. There's an open GH issue for this: https://github.com/apache/infrastructure-boxer/pull/47
Is there a different approach? The ASF Infra ticket is unfortunately still pending as well, so I'd appreciate any pointers on getting this unblocked. Sung On 2026/07/20 05:04:28 Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: > Hi > > We didn't need an infra ticket: we can create the repository > ourselves, including if the name is not "conventional". > > I will tackle the infra ticket directly :) > > Regards > JB > > > On Fri, Jul 17, 2026 at 5:23 PM Sung Yun <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Thanks, everyone. As 72 hours have now passed without objection, I'll move > > forward with creating the repository. > > > > I've opened an Apache INFRA JIRA to request repository creation, as the > > unconventional repository name is not yet supported by the self-service > > portal. > > > > I'll update this thread once the repository is successfully created. > > > > Sung > > > > > > On 2026/07/14 01:16:14 Yong Zheng wrote: > > > +1 > > > > > > Thanks, > > > Yong Zheng > > > > > > > On Jul 13, 2026, at 7:19 PM, Dmitri Bourlatchkov <[email protected]> > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > Hi Sung, > > > > > > > > Thanks for volunteering! I agree that it is fine to go ahead with this > > > > repository creation in 72 hours. > > > > > > > > Cheers, > > > > Dmitri. > > > > > > > >> On Mon, Jul 13, 2026 at 8:16 PM Sung Yun <[email protected]> wrote: > > > >> > > > >> Hi folks, > > > >> > > > >> It looks like we are generally in agreement that this is a good idea. > > > >> Given that the HashiCorp Cloud Platform Public Registry has a > > > >> restriction > > > >> on the repository name, creating the repository as > > > >> "terraform-provider-polaris" sounds reasonable. > > > >> > > > >> If there are no objections to creating this repository under that name > > > >> in > > > >> the next 72 hours, I will see that as lazy consensus, and go ahead and > > > >> set > > > >> up the repository. > > > >> > > > >> Thanks, > > > >> Sung > > > >> > > > >>> On 2026/07/07 19:52:02 Alex Stephen via dev wrote: > > > >>> It will need a dedicated repository that must be > > > >>> called `terraform-provider-polaris`. The Terraform Registry (their > > > >> package > > > >>> manager) is very opinionated about repository names > > > >>> <https://developer.hashicorp.com/terraform/registry/providers/publishing > > > >>> . > > > >>> > > > >>> On Tue, Jul 7, 2026 at 7:59 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré > > > >>> <[email protected]> > > > >> wrote: > > > >>> > > > >>>> Hi Alex > > > >>>> > > > >>>> That looks great to me. > > > >>>> > > > >>>> Does it need a separate/dedicated repository or can it be part of the > > > >>>> polaris-tools repo? > > > >>>> > > > >>>> Regards > > > >>>> JB > > > >>>> > > > >>>> On Mon, Jul 6, 2026 at 8:21 PM Alex Stephen via dev < > > > >>>> [email protected]> wrote: > > > >>>> > > > >>>>> Hello, > > > >>>>> > > > >>>>> The Apache Iceberg project has been working on a Terraform Provider > > > >>>>> <https://github.com/apache/terraform-provider-iceberg>. We're hoping > > > >> to > > > >>>>> release it soon. We originally accepted some PRs for Polaris-based > > > >>>>> resources (Polaris Principals mainly), but the community decided we > > > >> should > > > >>>>> focus exclusively on Iceberg resources. > > > >>>>> > > > >>>>> We'd like to rehome the Polaris resources into a dedicated Polaris > > > >>>>> Terraform Provider. I'm more than happy to dedicate time to making > > > >> this > > > >>>>> happen. It would need to live in a dedicated repository called > > > >>>>> "terraform-provider-polaris," since the Terraform Registry is > > > >>>>> opinionated about that. > > > >>>>> > > > >>>>> Is this something the community is interested in? > > > >>>>> > > > >>>>> Thanks! > > > >>>>> > > > >>>>> -- Alex Stephen > > > >>>>> > > > >>>> > > > >>> > > > >> > > > >
