Agree with all of that... On Feb 21, 2017 01:06, "Paul Merlin" <paulmer...@apache.org> wrote:
> Gang, > > Yeah we should aim at releasing 3.0 soon. > > We still have quite a bunch of in-flight issues we should resolve before > that. > I'm thinking about serialization, integration tests for the yeoman > generated projects and other stuff we have in JIRA. > We also found some discrepancies in the build system due to my recent > rewrite. I need to fix this. > I cannot make any guarantee as to how much time it will take from my > side, busy times. But I will surely make slow regular progress. > > We should publish at least one RC out to gather some feedback, there > have been a LOT of changes since 2.1. > > Cheers > > /Paul > > > Niclas Hedhman a écrit : > > Gang, > > now that the name change is behind us, and practically all names have > > changed (some still missing in release process), I would like to turn the > > attention to a release in the near future. > > > > Since there are still things that we want to change, I would like to make > > the following compromise to go forward. > > > > * Polygene Core has practically no incompatible changes in the pipeline > as > > far as I know. > > > > * Polygene Extensions have several incompatible changes that I would like > > to do, both in terms of Serialization as well as the EntityStore SPI. > But, > > these are relatively hidden from user code, so perhaps we just mark that > > the SPIs might change within 3.x and we don't worry about compatibility. > > > > * Polygene Libraries are of varying quality. I suggest that we go through > > the list, remove obsolete ones, and update devstatus.xml to better > reflect > > reality. I think it is more important to Release an incomplete library, > but > > make sure that the devstatus is accurate which shows up in the > > documentation. > > > > With this in mind, we should be able to start release process this month. > > And let's aim for new release with every feature update from then on, > i.e. > > try to get release process even more streamlined (if possible). > > > > WDYT? > > > > > > Cheers >
