[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/POLYGENE-95?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15962308#comment-15962308
]
Niclas Hedhman commented on POLYGENE-95:
----------------------------------------
Paul suggest on mailing list that a small internal change is made for 3.0, to
support the introduction of this later;
We can look at this one in very different ways and see small increments
that can give us some goodness without eating the whole cake. What I would like
us to do quickly, and preferably
for 3.0, is to change how Entity state is serialized in our EntityStore SPI
helpers.
Today, the "value" part of an EntityState is mixed with entity aspects:
{code:json}
{
reference: "..",
application_version: "..",
type: "..",
version: "..",
modified: "..",
properties: {..},
associations: {..},
manyassociations: {..},
namedassociations: {..}
}
{code}
I'm thinking about persisting entities with the following structure instead:
{code:json}
{
identity: "..",
application_version: "..",
type: "..",
version: "..",
modified: "..",
value: { // Exact same state (de)serialization as values
myProperty: {..},
myAssoc: "..",
myManyAssoc: [..],
myNamedAssoc: {..}
}
}
{code}
This is quite simple to change, simplifies a lot of code and I'm willing to
push that forward rather quickly.
I already have a local experiment of this change.
BUT, this is a breaking change of the storage format so before doing so I'd
like to know what do you all think.
3.0 is a good time to do this. Don't want to wait for 4.0. If we want to
push a version out prior to that change, then it should be a -ALPHA1 instead of
a -RC1.
> Entity = Identity + Value
> -------------------------
>
> Key: POLYGENE-95
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/POLYGENE-95
> Project: Polygene
> Issue Type: Sub-task
> Reporter: Niclas Hedhman
>
> By viewing an Entity as a composite of an Immutable Identity and a single
> Value, we end up with easier transactional semantics, and a generic "Merge"
> facility could be created.
> For Entities with a lot of properties, where only a small number change each
> time, we would recommend that the static part and the dynamic part are
> implemented as two sub-entities, or a main entity with all static bits and a
> sub-entity with the changing data.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)
