Uhhh... A Composite Oriented Programming Language. In essence, a lot of the things that are now detected at boot time could be compile errors.
But how it would otherwise be, your guess is as good as mine. I would probably be less "everything is an object" and explore more nuanced approaches, with more data-rich functionality. Details? No idea... On Fri, Jul 6, 2018 at 9:48 AM, Roman Shaposhnik <ro...@shaposhnik.org> wrote: > On Wed, Jul 4, 2018 at 5:25 PM, Niclas Hedhman <nic...@hedhman.org> wrote: > > I understand your point about "fundamentally different than the language" > > part, and that was some of the expert's questions back at the start, > "This > > should be done in a new language", and we rebutted that the effort needed > > would be magnitudes larger, to to mention the tooling and ecosystem > needed > > around it. > > Off-topic, but have you guys thought about what kind of language that > could be? > > Thanks, > Roman. > -- Niclas Hedhman, Software Developer http://polygene.apache.org - New Energy for Java
