On 11/08/2020 01.05, sebb wrote:
[snip] *Any* changes need to be tested, especially since bugs here can have permanent consequences.
I am sort of stumped with regards to what needs to be tested here, and what concerns you have about adopting the ES7.x standard layout.
I think we can all agree that more testing is better, but we need some semblance of an idea of what/how to test, or we'll be at this impasse for a long while :)
The change I am proposing (upgrading the archiver to support ES6/7) does not alter the document IDs, it does not change the sources, and it's not meant to be used with the old system at all, as that wouldn't work with ES7 anyway. It's a very literal "instead of using database named A, we use database named B" operation.
