Nothing looks specifically alarming. It would probably be better if the license referred back to the files under the license, but no big deal.
+1 On Tue, Jul 12, 2016 at 5:02 AM Daniel Gruno <[email protected]> wrote: > Hello folks, > As mentioned earlier, I have now started the release process for the 0.9 > branch, and am now calling a vote on release candidate 1. > > This is a vote on the artefacts collected from the tree in the 0.9 > branch with commit hash 9881edb4ff13b88d231b5a069399a74d9550c2fe. > > The tree can be inspected at > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-ponymail/tree/9881edb4ff13b88d231b5a069399a74d9550c2fe > > The release candidate is available at: > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/ponymail/ > > Specifically, this is a vote on > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/ponymail/apache-pony-mail-0.9.RC1-incubating.tar.gz > (sha1 > <https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/ponymail/apache-pony-mail-0.9.RC1-incubating.tar.gz(sha1> > and asc files are provided as well). > > Please inspect and vet the candidate and cast your votes accordingly: > > [ ] +1: Good to go > [ ] 0: Meh, either way is fine > [ ] -1: Don't release because.... > > Anyone is welcome to vote on this release. > PPMC members can cast binding votes for the podling's release decision, > and IPMC members may cast binding votes that carry over to the IPMC > release vote later. This initial vote will last 72 hours (or less if all > possible votes have been cast). > > With regards, > Daniel. >
