+1

- Michelle

> On Sep 1, 2016, at 10:09 AM, Daniel Gruno <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> Hi folks,
> 
> As is evident, we haven't been getting a lot of traction on the JS dev
> front from new people, and as such, I am going to bring up an old
> subject, rehashed a bit.
> 
> Specifically, I would like to propose that we make a coffee branch of
> PonyMail with a ReactDOM-like approach to handling DOM, making it
> clearer and neater what goes on in the big ol' DOM tree, which is rather
> messy right now (and I fear that's why people aren't trying to tackle
> issues themselves).
> 
> In my opinion, this will:
> - Make the UI segments cleaner, more intuitive
> - Make DOM handling much easier going forward
> - Make things a tad faster
> - Allow us to properly use view classes and have new views inherit
> defaults from the original classes.
> - Allow for a higher rate of commentary as the DOM kludges disappear
> 
> To get things started, I'll be setting up the branch and testing a
> complete migration, but what I naturally need is the community's
> approval of making this the _default_ development process going forward.
> 
> I'd like to think of this as PonyMail Mark 2, and it's my hope that
> it'll be accepted by the community. I haven't pushed any volleys of code
> just yet, as I haven't started, but I'll begin by adding some DOM and
> API tools first, and then work my way towards the actual interface.
> I suspect the API and backend will remain the same.
> 
> This will be an experiment to start with, but hopefully one that bears
> fruit :)
> 
> So, thoughts, comments, etc (even a +1!) are welcome.
> 
> With regards,
> Daniel.

Reply via email to