On 26/09/2016 11:45, Daniel Gruno wrote:
On 09/26/2016 11:36 AM, sebb wrote:
I could not find a tag for the 0.9 release in the Git repo.
Surely there should be one?
While it's not strictly required, I agree we should have a 0.9 tag.
Can someone sort this out? :) see the [VOTE] thread for the exact tree
this should point to.
The VOTE mail for 0.9 (the RC2 which eventually passed) [1] reports
The git hash for the current 0.9.RC2 head is:
116797982cec1e483349ed48a397e0b0cdad5b1d
I can take care of creating such tag.
For future releases, I'd propose to set as required to create a tag, for
the release process: it definitely helps keeping track of things.
Regards.
[1]
https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/9fd77b14753bbde462bea06fc2e1c03d5cf5a89cea2fabd6751d805a@%3Cdev.ponymail.apache.org%3E
--
Francesco Chicchiriccò
Tirasa - Open Source Excellence
http://www.tirasa.net/
Member at The Apache Software Foundation
Syncope, Cocoon, Olingo, CXF, OpenJPA, PonyMail
http://home.apache.org/~ilgrosso/
