On 11 November 2016 at 02:30, John D. Ament <[email protected]> wrote: > +1 > > would you want some puppet config to be able to build the box from? and > would it be possible to grant the PPMC access to the box for manual testing?
That's what I am assuming/hoping. Otherwise it's going to be far less useful. > On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 9:21 PM Gavin McDonald <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> >> > On 11 Nov. 2016, at 1:16 pm, sebb <[email protected]> wrote: >> > >> > Would it be worth setting up a test installation, along with some test >> data? >> > >> > This would allow testing of changes to the code by many more people. >> > >> > And would allow people who have reported bugs to see if any fixes work >> for them. >> > >> > I think we should use only public data just in case (we could simulate >> > some private mails). >> > >> > Since the Permalinks could not be guaranteed to work long-term, I >> > think the button text should also be changed on the box. Maybe the >> > list ids could be changed as well. >> > >> > Thoughts? >> >> I think its a good idea. Ask Infra for a test box where a Nightly/Weekly >> wipe and build of trunk/master >> can be available with test data. >> >> Gav… >> >>
