On 09/03/2017 11:25 AM, sebb wrote: > IMO the name 'redundant' for the generator is misleading. > It sounds like it is no longer used. > > It should be renamed. > > For example 'cluster' > Or 'invariant' as that is what it is trying to be. >
I have no strong attachment to the name. If you feel like a different name is better suited, you are, from my point of view, more than welcome to rename it.
