On 02/09/2018 05:07 PM, sebb wrote:
> Not so; a release must be capable of being built *and tested*.
> Whilst the code currently has very few tests, there are some, and
> users should be able to run them.
That's a matter of interpretation, I'd say.
I left out the test dir, as it's not required for installing and using
the software (generally speaking, the test dir in my opinion is for us
developers, not the end user). You are free to of course vote -1 on that