On 9 February 2018 at 16:17, Daniel Gruno <humbed...@apache.org> wrote: > On 02/09/2018 05:07 PM, sebb wrote: > >> >> Not so; a release must be capable of being built *and tested*. >> http://www.apache.org/legal/release-policy.html#source-packages >> >> Whilst the code currently has very few tests, there are some, and >> users should be able to run them. > > That's a matter of interpretation, I'd say.
The sentence is: "Every ASF release MUST contain one or more source packages, which MUST be sufficient for a user to build and test the release provided they have access to the appropriate platform and tools." How can it be right to omit the tests? > I left out the test dir, as it's not required for installing and using > the software (generally speaking, the test dir in my opinion is for us > developers, not the end user). You are free to of course vote -1 on that > basis. I have already.