On 9 February 2018 at 16:17, Daniel Gruno <humbed...@apache.org> wrote:
> On 02/09/2018 05:07 PM, sebb wrote:
>> Not so; a release must be capable of being built *and tested*.
>> Whilst the code currently has very few tests, there are some, and
>> users should be able to run them.
> That's a matter of interpretation, I'd say.
The sentence is:
"Every ASF release MUST contain one or more source packages, which
MUST be sufficient for a user to build and test the release provided
they have access to the appropriate platform and tools."
How can it be right to omit the tests?
> I left out the test dir, as it's not required for installing and using
> the software (generally speaking, the test dir in my opinion is for us
> developers, not the end user). You are free to of course vote -1 on that
I have already.