Hi, Ken Foskey wrote: > On Fri, 2005-01-21 at 22:07 -0600, scott hutinger wrote: > > BTW, does anyone know much about the current state of the ARM port? I > > know my name is on the ARM port, but have been busy with other things. > > I was going to see about running it on a handheld ( with hard drive ) > > along with derby. > > > > What is the current ARM status in the cvs/ ( I really like subversion)/ > > snapshot? > > ARM is non-existent to the best of my knowledge. Last mention of ARM on > porting you answered in May.
Simply wrong. Peter Naulls did complete the ARM port. I did take his patches (he did submit them into the Debian BTS) and did file an issue for them and created cws_srx645_linuxarm (waiting for QA since ....). See http://lists.debian.org/debian-arm/2004/11/msg00011.html http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=260435&archive=yes&repeatmerged=no http://qa.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=36697 I built installsets and debs (didn't update the debs to current state yet..) and installed the installset on a debian machine where it installed and ran fine (did do basic checks only though because of X fwd etc..) http://people.debian.org/~rene/openoffice.org/test/arm/ The non-existency only means that the cws isn't integrated in 1.1.x because mh didn't yet do QA... (For 680 someone needs to write the multiple ibheritance stuff, Psion stopped funding the port to my knowledge..) Gr��e/Regards, Ren� -- Ren� Engelhard -- Debian GNU/Linux Developer -- Debian OOo Maintainer-Team http://www.debian.org | http://people.debian.org/~rene/ | [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://openoffice.debian.net | [email protected] GPG: 248AEB73 | Fingerprint: 41FA F208 28D4 7CA5 19BB 7AD9 F859 90B0 248A EB73
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
