Hi Terry, Am Wed, 27 Apr 2005 00:34:41 -0700, schrieb Terry Teague: > Dear Folks, > > Finally success! > > I checked out the 1.9m96 sources from CVS, and more or less followed Eric's > build instructions, applying the patches he referred to, applying Maho's > patches for 1.9m96, and using Florian's pre-built Mozilla binaries etc. > > I built with Xcode v1.5, X11 SDK, Java JDK v1.4.2_03, Mac OS X 10.3.9. > > I just went and rechecked the build instructions on the web site, and I see > they were updated from the original that I downloaded and used. BUT both > documents have the same modification date of 4/14/05. Eric, did you modify > the instructions twice that day, or did you forget to update the > modification date?
I did forget to update the modification date. But I also updated the build instructions twice the same day. There were some bugs in the original file posted that day. I mixed the both versions laying on my hdd. The next major update was just a Special Thanks to the coders and here I foregt to change the modification date. My fault. > Here is the configure command I used : > > ./configure --with-x > --with-jdk-home=/System/Library/Frameworks/JavaVM.framework/Home/ > --with-ant-home=/usr/local/ant/ --disable-gtk > --with-freetype2=/usr/X11R6/include/ --with-epm=internal --with-mozilla > --disable-gnome-vfs > > > I ran into 2 minor problems : > > 1) I accidentally applied both Maho's old (patch-vcl+source+app+svdata.cxx) > and new (gslpatches patch-gslpatches) patches for #i42778#, and 'patch' got > confused, so I had to manually fix the file - hopefully I fixed it > correctly. > > 2) There is a problem with Eric's patch for the freetype2 test > (scp2_source_ooo_file_library_ooo_scp.patch). Yes I know. I have clean sources here and I create new patches today. > I don't know if it is needed any more. They are only needed if you use Darwinports freetype2. It seems to have a wrong version numbering which causes problems when used in mixed mode with the Apple's X11 freetpye2. finks's freetype and propably the one of pkgsrc aren't affected they seem to have correct version numbering and beeing able to interact with Apple's X11 freetype2. I have found the question and a bug entry in Darwinports mailinglist but so far no reaction from their side. I guess I will have to ask myself if nothing changes here. > But more importantly the patch is > not syntactically valid (and in theory wouldn't be executed even if it was > valid, in 1.9m96), and causes a build problem if applied to 1.9m96. Yes. Something changed between m92 and m96. I noticed the same here when I tried to apply the m92 patch for freetype to my m95 and m96 sources. Thanks for the hint Terry. > Eric, you could please review this patch, and either update it, or remove > it from your iDisk. I do. > > The build completed successfully, and after a bit of digging I found the > Mac OS X Installer packages that were created. > > A question - I installed Florian's createMetaPackage.sh script as per the > instructions, but no ".mpkg" was created - is the createMetaPackage.sh > script supposed to be executed automatically as part of the build process, > or should I execute it manually (which sort of defeats the point of > installing the script in a specific location)? It is supposed to be executed automatically but you can also execute it by hand. Therefore you use "solenv/bin/createMetapackage.sh <language code>" e.g. "solenv/bin/createMetapackage.sh en-US" for en_US builds "solenv/bin/createMetapackage.sh de" for german builds etc. > I guess I need to come up to speed with the OOo native installation stuff - > would it be possible to automatically build one large Installer package, > rather than the many pieces we have now, if we so choose? > > Since there was no ".mpkg" created, I haven't tried to install > the build yet. > > One of the things missing from the build instructions are where to find the > finished results, and how things should be installed. Yes, you're right. For me after having build enough Milestone it was clear where to find finished builds but yes a newby may not. > > I have some corrections to the build instructions that I will send to Eric > or the list (if preferred). You can send them to me. I'm very interested in keeping my build instrcutions up to date. It's in my foreword that due to the nature of a port in progress they may change. But I hope that my first try wasn't that bad at all. Thanks for your feedback. Regards, Eric Hoch -- ## Ansprechpartner Anwenderunterst�tzung, users-Mailingliste, MacOSX ## de.OpenOffice.org - Office f�r MacOS X, Linux, Solaris & Windows ## Openoffice.org - ich steck mit drin! --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
