Hi Eric, 
Am Sat, 20 Aug 2005 10:53:51 +0200, schrieb eric.bachard:
> FYI, my sources are clean (complete new tree), and I have tested 
> following builds of stlport :
> - stlport m121, stlport m124 builds fine

for me m117 and m123 stlport build fine.

> - stlport m125 -> breakage

confirmed.
 
> So I have analyzed the changes made in m125 and rebuild a new 
> "universal" patch.
> 
> The new patch I provided works fine, what I'm not sure is : does 
> it exactly what it should do. For me, he just adds a new flag, 
> but I can be wrong. I think pmladek will give us an answer soon.
> 
> So any build, on any arch/OS using this patch (even if it does 
> nothing) will really be apprreciated :-)

See my comment on the issue. 

M125 broke using Mac OS X 10.3.9 breaks in stlport right after 
applying the patch comming with m125. Replace the patch with the 
one out of Issue 51963 and stlport compiles. 

Build Enviroment:
Mac OS X 10.3.9 including all the latest fixes and security updates
XCode 1.5 plus Novemer 2004 gcc 3.3 Update
 
>  If you want to be 100% sure I can
>> checkout m125 sources on monday and build them over the next few 
>> days afterwards. 

Build of m125 is running at the moment on my PowerMac while I can 
write Emails with my PB. 
 
> Yes, that's kind of you. BTW, are you the last one to be able to 
> build on Panther ? It would be cool if you could build french 
> versions of m125 and 1.1.5.

I will have french, englisch and german versions of m125. 
@Eric B: Do you think it may be possible that I can upload my 
builds of m125 to your ftp server? Let me know via private mail. 

If m125 has finished I will try my best with SRX645_m57 aka 
1.1.5rc3 or so. 

Regards, 
Eric Hoch

-- 
## Ansprechpartner Anwenderunterstützung, users-Mailingliste, MacOSX
## de.OpenOffice.org - Office für MacOS X, Linux, Solaris & Windows
## Openoffice.org - ich steck mit drin!

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to