Petr Mladek wrote:
On Wednesday 16 November 2005 09:10, Stephan Bergmann wrote:
Petr Mladek wrote:
However, note that I did not tell the whole story: :)
getCppuType<T> is currently defined in Type.hxx as calling
getCppuType(static_cast<T*>(0)), so it has exactly the same problem as
Any::operator<<=() (i.e., it does not work for a named UNO type if the
header for that type is only included after Type.hxx). My solution
would include adding explicit specializations of getCppuType<T> to all
the generated header files.
In light of that, I am not sure whether Petr's solution (of which I had
not thought yet) is not the more elegant one.
...which is broken logic: getCppuType<T> needs to be fixed too, anyway.
I could prepare patches, test it, ... The only problem is that any of
the solutions would need many changes, so I would like to prepare a
solution that is acceptable for you :-)
I think I will set up a CWS in which I change the definitions and uses
of getCppuType accordingly (note this includes fixing cppumaker)
sometime in the next couple weeks. Does that meet your needs?
Ah, we are already using gcc-4.1-pre to produce alfa versions of our upcoming
products. We would need a usable fix as soon as possible, preferably during
next two weeks.
I understand that you want to finish some other tasks before you start working
on this huge change.
I think about a solution that would be acceptable for both of us.
Is the main problem to design the new solution? Would you like to have more
time to think about the changes?
Or is the main problem to do the dirty work (hack so many sources, check and
test the changes)? I could do the dirty work if you describe the necessary
changes or if you give me some more hints about the necessary changes at
least.
If I am not confused (again), the only necessary changes are to the
various declarations and definitions of getCppuType. So not that much
to change. :) I am doing that right now locally, and by tomorrow
moring will hopefully know whether the changes do not break anything on
any of our Hamburg platforms. I will commit the changes to CWS sb40
then, so you can check that they indeed help for GCC 4.1.
-Stephan
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
