Providing maven artifacts is ok provided the jars embed LICENSE and NOTICE 
files as required. The release artifact we vote on will be the source tarball 
though. 

> On Sep 20, 2016, at 2:41 PM, Donald Szeto <don...@apache.org> wrote:
> 
> Hi Andy,
> 
> What if the set of artifacts are built from the source tarball, and they
> are an integral part of the ecosystem (e.g. PredictionIO engine developers
> use these artifacts to build engines)?
> 
> I read from
> http://www.apache.org/dev/publishing-maven-artifacts.html#stage-release-vote
> that we need to have RC artifacts on Nexus for voters to test?
> 
> Regards,
> Donald
> 
> On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 2:02 PM, Andrew Purtell <andrew.purt...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> 
>> The release artifact should be one signed and summed tarball.
>> 
>>> On Sep 20, 2016, at 10:36 AM, Suneel Marthi <smar...@apache.org> wrote:
>>> 
>>> that was my thinking too, hence I have been holding off from even
>>> downloading any of the artifacts.
>>> 
>>>> On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 7:32 PM, Pat Ferrel <p...@occamsmachete.com>
>> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> Shouldn’t this be one tarball?
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> On Sep 18, 2016, at 6:53 PM, Donald Szeto <don...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> Yes. Many of them are sources, docs, poms and signatures though.
>>>> 
>>>> On Sun, Sep 18, 2016 at 6:02 PM, Suneel Marthi <suneel.mar...@gmail.com
>>> 
>>>> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> So all of these artifacts need to be verified and validated ?
>>>>> 
>>>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/
>>>>> orgapachepredictionio-1003/org/apache/predictionio/
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>>> On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 2:59 AM, Donald Szeto <don...@apache.org>
>> wrote:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> I will start a new voting thread. The staging repo should contain just
>>>>>> PredictionIO artifacts.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> On Sun, Sep 18, 2016 at 5:57 PM, Suneel Marthi <smar...@apache.org>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> the MAven staging repo brings up whole load of artifacts, which ones
>> r
>>>>> we
>>>>>>> voting on again ?
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 2:49 AM, Donald Szeto <don...@apache.org>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> I have prepared a RC2. The artifacts can be downloaded here:
>>>>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/
>>>>> predictionio/0.10.0-
>>>>>>>> incubating-rc2/
>>>>>>>> or from the Maven staging repo here:
>>>>>>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/
>>>>>>>> orgapachepredictionio-1003/
>>>>>>>> .
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Do we need to vote on the RC2 again?
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> On Sat, Sep 17, 2016 at 2:10 PM, Pat Ferrel <p...@occamsmachete.com>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> Hate to make more work for you but the new name would also maybe
>>>>>> avoid
>>>>>>>>> some confusion for older migrating users.
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> On Sep 16, 2016, at 9:02 AM, Donald Szeto <don...@apache.org>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> If everyone agrees that the artifacts should have an "apache-"
>>>>>> prefix,
>>>>>>> I
>>>>>>>>> will roll an RC2 shortly. Since the namespace change is
>>>>> unavoidable,
>>>>>>>> might
>>>>>>>>> as well get all artifact name changes done in one shot for good.
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> On Friday, September 16, 2016, Andrew Purtell <
>>>>>>> andrew.purt...@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> Let me double check.
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> On Sep 16, 2016, at 7:33 AM, Alex Merritt <
>>>>>> emergentor...@apache.org
>>>>>>>>>> <javascript:;>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> I believe it depends on which of the two votes you mean. For the
>>>>>>>> podling
>>>>>>>>>>> vote, PPMC votes are binding, for the incubator vote,  IPMC
>>>>> votes
>>>>>>> are,
>>>>>>>>>> no?
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sep 15, 2016 9:42 PM, "Andrew Purtell" <
>>>>>>> andrew.purt...@gmail.com
>>>>>>>>>> <javascript:;>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> I believe 'binding' only applies to IPMC.
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sep 15, 2016, at 12:49 PM, Suneel Marthi <
>>>>>>>> suneel.mar...@gmail.com
>>>>>>>>>> <javascript:;>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Folks, When u vote please specify "+1 Binding" if u r a PMC
>>>>>>> member.
>>>>>>>>> Its
>>>>>>>>>>>>> only the PMC votes that count for a release to pass.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 2:11 PM, Robert Lu <
>>>>>>> robberp...@outlook.com
>>>>>>>>>> <javascript:;>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +1
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sep 15, 2016, at 01:13, Matthew Tovbin <
>>>>> tovb...@apache.org
>>>>>>>>>> <javascript:;>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +1
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 10:12 AM, Pat Ferrel <
>>>>>>>>> p...@occamsmachete.com
>>>>>>>>>> <javascript:;>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +1
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sep 13, 2016, at 11:55 AM, Donald Szeto <
>>>>>>>> donald.sz...@gmail.com
>>>>>>>>>> <javascript:;>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> This is the vote for 0.10.0 of Apache PredictionIO
>>>>>>> (incubating).
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The vote will run for at least 72 hours and will close on
>>>>>> Sept
>>>>>>>>> 16th,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2016.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The artifacts can be downloaded here:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/
>>>>> dist/dev/incubator/predictioni
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> o/0.10.0-incubating-rc1/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> or
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> from the Maven staging repo here:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://repository.apache.org/
>>>>> content/repositories/orgapache
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> predictionio-1001/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> All JIRAs completed for this release are tagged with
>>>>>>> 'FixVersion
>>>>>>>> =
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 0.10.0'.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You can view them here:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?
>>>>> proje
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ctId=12320420&version=12337844
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The artifacts have been signed with Key : 8BF4ABEB
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Please vote accordingly:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [ ] +1, accept RC as the official 0.10.0 release
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [ ] -1, do not accept RC as the official 0.10.0 release
>>>>>>>> because...
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>> 

Reply via email to