Yes! Sounds like it would make Pulsar more awesome! Regards, Yong
On Mon, 2 Nov 2020 at 22:19, Jia Zhai <zhaiji...@gmail.com> wrote: > Thanks a lot for the initiative, Enrico. > From my point of view, It would be great if the upcoming Pulsar release > would have these features. > BP-41, and Explicit LAC would be a great help for Pulsar. BP-41 could make > the use of BookKeeper more flexible. Explicit LAC could solve the one > Pulsar issue, in which the last message is not reachable. This would also > help make these features get a real test in Pulsar. > > > Best Regards. > > > Jia Zhai > > Beijing, China > > Mobile: +86 15810491983 > > > > > On Fri, Oct 30, 2020 at 11:25 PM Enrico Olivelli <eolive...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > Hello, > > we pushed today a change that upgraded BookKeeper library to 4.11.1, that > > is the latest released version of BookKeeper. > > > > BookKeeper 4.12.0 comes with great features that would be useful for > > Pulsar, especially BP-41, that allows Bookies to have dynamic network > > addresses and the support for Explicit LAC in the new API. > > > > Hopefully in the BK community we will be ready to ship BK 4.12.0 by the > end > > of November. > > Is it worth thinking about having BK 4.12.0 in the upcoming Pulsar > release > > ? > > > > Best regards > > Enrico > > >
